Electronics Forum: flux activity (Page 1 of 49)

Flux activity with SAC305

Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 28 09:10:55 EDT 2005 | Cmiller

What stencil reduction are you using so the resistors dont bridge??

Flux activity with SAC305

Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 28 08:12:38 EDT 2005 | jh0n!

That's pretty much what I figured - just wanted some external verification if possible. And don't so much as BREATHE that around here. I'm just waiting for engineering's *next* bright idea. ;)

Flux activity with SAC305

Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 28 11:14:48 EDT 2005 | jh0n!

On chips, none - 1:1. Those are 1206 chips, either .010 or .015" between them. I've never seen one bridge. Some *rare* billboarding. That's it. *shrug* These QFNs, tho....

Flux activity with SAC305

Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 27 22:14:57 EDT 2005 | Ken

If no-clean...then this seems "relatively" normal. You could try and extend your peak and duration, however, manufacturers are adjusting their chemistry to survive these normal temperatures (up to 260C and 30 seconds within 5C of peak). You will h

Flux activity with SAC305

Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 27 11:28:55 EDT 2005 | jh0n!

This may be completely normal, but I'm not used to seeing this with our old SnPb. I'm setting up reflow profiles for a SAC305 alloy, and it seems that on some of our larger pads, the flux seems to pool in the center. Is this perhaps a sign that I'm

Solder and flux

Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 23 08:40:20 EDT 2002 | davef

Yer not making this easy. What kind of flux? If no-clean flux, what controls are you using to assure you are: * Applying the correct amount of flux? * Properly activating the flux? If water washable flux, talk to us about your cleaning methods and

Rework using flux pens

Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 08 17:29:20 EST 2002 | davef

Your research is on track. NC flux needs to reach activation temperature. Also, do not depend on the corrosion characteristics associated with the flux classification (ie, L1, L0, M1, M0, etc.), until the flux is activated by exposure to soldering

Problem with flux

Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 20 11:24:22 EDT 2009 | ghepo

Hello Armando, this is what I found into the handbook "Failure Analysis of Electronic processes" : "...Flux residues with water-soluble flux activators that are conductive and corrosive if left on in large enough quantities are detrimental. If you

no-clean flux vs. impedance

Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 18 17:27:13 EST 2008 | jdumont

If the hand soldering is done right and you use little to no extra flux (other than whats in the solder wire) you should be ok. You should still verify with some testing however... You need to make sure any flux used is activated, thus rendered benig

no-clean flux vs. impedance

Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 18 17:36:32 EST 2008 | kennyg

I should have mentioned... the only flux we use for the hand soldering is wire-core, no bottle flux. I think it should be a non-issue to leave the activated wire core flux residue. I'm just looking for some way to prove it to the designer.

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next

flux activity searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information

SMT feeders

Software programs for SMT placement and AOI Inspection machines from CAD or Gerber.
2024 Eptac IPC Certification Training Schedule

Have you found a solution to REDUCE DISPENSE REWORK? Your answer is here.
thru hole soldering and selective soldering needs

Stencil Printing 101 Training Course