Electronics Forum: fuji flexible placement platform (Page 1 of 7)

Fuji AIM platform

Electronics Forum | Mon Jun 13 18:07:56 EDT 2005 | Grant

Hi, I saw these machines and asked our Fuji rep about it. He said it was for flexible low volume manufacturing. Regards, Grant

Fuji AIM platform

Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 24 00:50:10 EDT 2005 | FAC

The AIM was actually designed to use some of the same hardware that the NXT machines use (placement heads, feeders). Main use for this machine is HighMix/LowVolume, NPI, prototyping. It will be at the ATE show in Sept. BTW - It is not going to replac

i-PULSE placement systems

Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 22 04:19:50 EDT 2006 | Rob

Hi Basem, We are seeing a lot of our customers buying M2's & M4E's, and they are very happy with them. These are intellegent, profitable & well informed CEMs in the main, and for the money there is nothing else new that competes. Depending on wh

i-PULSE placement systems

Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 21 20:37:21 EDT 2006 | basem

Does anyone on this forum has experience with any of i-PULSE SMD placement systems? I am looking at the M4e. Also, can someone advise me on what to choose if the desired final circuit is of very high density and small pitch (0.5mm)? I am considerin

SMT placement machines. Where are we going ?

Electronics Forum | Tue May 19 09:40:33 EDT 2009 | cyber_wolf

Subject: What placement platform/manufacturer will dominate the future of sub-contract? or OEM for that matter. I have worked multiple placement platforms over the last 20 years. I have worked with Dynapert,Celmacs,Fuji and contact systems to name a

SMT placement machines. Where are we going ?

Electronics Forum | Tue May 26 22:10:58 EDT 2009 | fulldrawmike

I have worked on many platforms over the past 20+ years of being in SMT, before that it was thru hole so I go back to the late 70's in this line of work. Some manufacturers I have worked with have been Quad,Fuji,Amistar,Sanyo and Universal. Of those,

SMT placement machines. Where are we going ?

Electronics Forum | Mon Jun 01 09:03:18 EDT 2009 | sys_steven

This is a most INTERESTING thread! Every Pick and Place machine has its plus side and negative. Having worked on both sides, broker/service and production, I think I have a unique perspective on this. Over the years our market has changed to be mo

Researching placement machines - where do I start?!

Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 05 20:21:40 EST 2010 | steinerson

Hi Jeff I would recommend you to try unexpensive user friendly Juki Late Model KE760 series. you need a flexible machine that can handle components,fine pitch QFP. This machine is very unique. you can use even without an offline software optimizer,

Re: Which SMD placement machines are easiest to use?

Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 27 06:12:14 EST 2000 | Dean

Opeator point of view: 1. eassy to read menues. Organized structure. Large text and use of color to indicate important info status...green=good, yellow= warning, red=fatal etc. Simplicity rules in this realm. GUI are great for operations screens

New Pick and Place Operation

Electronics Forum | Wed Jun 02 16:33:08 EDT 2004 | davem

Fuji is the best, but there are other alternatives besides Quad. If you really want to look at Fuji, take a peek at their XP142E series. With "Vision processing on the fly" and a "Mini Turret Head" with 12 placement nozzles it should fit your needs n

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next

fuji flexible placement platform searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information