Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 04 12:22:07 EDT 2001 | davef
Several points: * Consider that your Cpk is probably different for both placing large and small components. * Probably your routine placement rate SB the speed you use to monitor the accuracy of your process. * Some people use a calibrated glass test
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 13 10:08:44 EDT 2002 | dougt
Tony, I'm in Ken's corner.....the speeds the manufacturers offer are pretty much meaningless when it comes down to your particular board. Brand X can say they will do 1,000,000 cph but when you put your board on the machine with multiple parts at di
Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 12 14:47:01 EDT 2002 | soupatech
Hi, Does anyone know the aprox. parts per hour a cp3 and ip2 should place assuming the program is optimized and everything else goes well (yeah right!)? I understand there are a lot of factors involved to get the correct numbers but what is the BEST
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 13 13:34:39 EDT 2002 | soupatech
Thanks for all the input everyone..... At least I have a starting point and have something to compare my actual numbers with. It seems to me the most important thing to worry about is feeders and writing the program correctly. I have spent most of my
Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 12 18:51:42 EDT 2002 | russ
The "BEST" thsat they could do is what is in the manual. BUT we all know that no-one that I know of designs boards with only 0805 on .100" centers with one component. CP 3 should give you on average maybe 10k per hour. IP 2 I really don't know sin
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 13 01:53:19 EDT 2002 | kenbliss
Hey Tony Although clearly everyone so far on this forum agrees that there is no real number in real life and virtual life is well....useless. The reality is that what you are really after is maximizing uptime, meaning, look closely at every event t
Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 12 18:26:05 EDT 2002 | pjc
If you are talking actual placement rate- from first fiducial read of board no. 1 to first fiducial read of board no. 2, here is the best I've ever seen based on the boards I've run: CP3- 141 seconds for 468 components per board (all rectangular chi
Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 30 07:39:54 EDT 2010 | jdengler
We do a similar part on a Fuji IP3. Set table speed to low. I do not know the QP, but if it's similar to the IP make sure the board clamp/unclamp is smooth. On our IP it got dirty and was jerking causing the board to jump a little which bounced ou
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 21 14:33:43 EDT 2015 | tsvetan
Setting aside the shameless advertisement :) Can you define what is high speed? The real high speed P&P machines are done by Sony, Juki, Samsung, Siemens, Fuji. The Chinese p&p machines I saw are with low speed (less 30 000 cph by ISO) poor design,
Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 15 03:58:22 EDT 2006 | jgarver1
Bert, Let it fly. The machine was built to run at 100% speed for certain components. I recommend finding a copy of Fuji's "SMT Report" to help you with speed settings for different packages. You can control the head speed on a part by part basi
.gif)
winsouce.jpg)