Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 13 15:35:14 EST 2007 | mulder0990
Our plant does not use an automated process, but I have done some research to the LPF Label Feeder by hover davis. It is for the Fuji IP, QP2, QP3, XP. Hope that will point you in some direction or get this thread started.
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 17 16:21:20 EDT 2009 | gregf912
I have not played with ProSMT software but I have used both MCS and F4G. MCS was good for its time, 15-20 years ago, but F4G is much better and easier to use. The windows interface works well and F4G and has optimizers for Cp, IP, QP machines. F4G wa
Electronics Forum | Sun May 23 19:43:29 EDT 2004 | Alan
Hi Grant, most of my experience is with the range of Fuji equipment, CP's, IP's, QP's. I have not worked with the CP7 yet. With the proper training, Fuji equipment is superb to work with and will run for years. My only Universal experience
Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 24 14:19:50 EDT 2001 | CAL
Fuji has always had stable machines CP,IP,Qp machines are true Fuji Form.I would shy away from the NP series though (for now). What I have found with Fuji - once it goes down it is down hard (Not taking the part shipped in from Japan into considerati
Electronics Forum | Thu Jun 10 16:23:11 EDT 2004 | davem
Hi Grant, In previous positions I've had experience with the Fuji CP43, CP6, CP642, CP643, CP65, IP3 & QP242. In operating, training and process engineering capacities. Presently, I'm working with 2 SMT lines (in a process engineering capacity) wit
| 1 |
