Electronics Forum | Mon Jun 01 00:46:14 EDT 1998 | S. S. Bist
We have few questions for BGA assembly. Specially with Fuji machines. 1. What are the testing mechanism other then X-rays. 2. How we get data from Fuji to check repeatability and reproducibility in terms of percentage and how it as calculated. 3. Do
Electronics Forum | Mon May 07 11:55:25 EDT 2018 | kdexter0928
I am trying to place an LQFP 208 with the fuji IP2 but I repeatedly get an error stating that there are too many leads. I have gone over the part data and started from scratch multiple times with the same outcome. I was hoping someone may have some p
Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 15 10:32:01 EDT 2004 | dscott
I have used fuji XP series for about 3-4 years now. We have XP1, XP2 & XP3 in our Prototype Dept. Excellent machines for this purpose. Very easy to program, can edit at the machine, placement, repeatability, reliability is just like any other Fuji
Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 09 09:43:38 EST 2005 | russ
Can't help you with the machine, but have you considered stencil printing? I have found that this seems to be a better (more repeatable) process than the dispensers I have used in the past (FUJI).
Electronics Forum | Wed Apr 28 22:16:51 EDT 1999 | Steve Gregory
| Hi everyone, | We started our first machine placed shield test today.We will be machine placing shields with in the next two months. I used a Fuji Qp242 today. There were no problems with pickup etc,. just vision errors. I'm sure we will work the
Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 27 13:04:35 EDT 2007 | rmitchell
Hi, I am having some problems with my Fuji CP6 placement repeatability. The placement drifts during the build about .06-.10 mm on parts. It has happened on several different builds this week. It is enough to cause some defects after reflow on smal
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 04 12:05:27 EST 2003 | ggspook
Thanks Mike Honestly the whole subject of repeatability is Is confusing i.e. I do perform placement tests using glass plate�s Fuji IP3 and Pam on the Fuji chip shooters which calibrate to 3 sigma but I cannot guarantee placement repeatability As y
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 29 00:00:50 EDT 1999 | FAC
| | Hi everyone, | | We started our first machine placed shield test today.We will be machine placing shields with in the next two months. I used a Fuji Qp242 today. There were no problems with pickup etc,. just vision errors. I'm sure we will work
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 29 13:33:13 EDT 1999 | KEVIN SIMPSON
| | | Hi everyone, | | | We started our first machine placed shield test today.We will be machine placing shields with in the next two months. I used a Fuji Qp242 today. There were no problems with pickup etc,. just vision errors. I'm sure we will
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 04 15:54:20 EST 2003 | msivigny
You're welcome John, it can get confusing but what's important is that machine's exhibit accuracy AND repeatability. Generally, high Cp values represent high repeatability (for instance in darts: hitting a triple 20 over and over means you're very re
winsouce.jpg)
.gif)
