Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 03 16:33:24 EST 2005 | pjc
Revision D has over 730 new and updated illustrations of acceptability criteria and has been critically reviewed for clarity and accuracy. The document synchronizes to the requirements expressed in other industry consensus documents and is used with
Electronics Forum | Wed May 20 17:56:51 EDT 2009 | dyoungquist
I have attached a pdf showing the dimensions for the QFN we placed. First, The pins on the part are not only on the bottom side but also wrap around to come up each of the 4 sides of the part as shown in the side view in the attached pdf. This i
Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 24 07:56:53 EST 1999 | Brian C
Under IPC-A-610 Section 10.3(Components on their sides) it reads: ______________________________________________________ Acceptable - Class 1,2 Nonconforming Defect � Class 3 Chip components on its side provided the following are met: Chip
Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 24 10:56:12 EST 1999 | Steve Schrader
| Under IPC-A-610 Section 10.3(Components on their sides) it reads: | ______________________________________________________ | Acceptable - Class 1,2 | Nonconforming Defect � Class 3 | | Chip components on its side provided the following | are
Electronics Forum | Sat Apr 26 01:27:33 EDT 2003 | Iman
no S**t, I was going into SMTnet to post a question, on : 1) what is the actual "physics" behind "Leaching" defect? what is the accurate desciption to define this defect? how to eliminate the general causes to this defect? If encounter, what work pr
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 28 10:10:15 EDT 2003 | caldon
www.aciusa.org Contact Guy Ramsey gramsey@aciusa.org 610-362-1200 Also, You can go to IPC's website http://www.ipc.org and they have a list of companies that provide training
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 03 09:07:07 EST 2004 | dramos1
Hi, We would like to know on the IPC-A-610 rev. C standard for acceptable and reject criteria, do we have to satisfy all that are listed on the manual or either one will be OK? Thanks for all the assistance that will provided. Dennis1
Electronics Forum | Wed May 03 15:45:44 EDT 2006 | Tim
Brett, I've found out that it is not a defect with respect to Rev. D. You are correct about the thermal expansion but due to the size of the plastic SOIC's and SOT's they have eliminated it as a defect. Thanks, Tim
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 03 09:42:31 EST 2004 | dramos1
Hi Simon, Thanks for the immediate reply. We really appreciate it very much. Currently, we are using Class 2 for the visual inspection criteria of our telecom boards. In IPC-A-610 Rev. C criteria, there are TARGET, ACCEPTABLE and REJECT criterias.
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 25 11:24:31 EDT 2005 | Daan Terstegge
I have a question about inspection, touch-up, and how far you need to go to get a product that meets the required IPC-spec. According to some reports (i.e. "New Study Reveals Component Defect Levels" by Stig Oresjo of Agilent) the average defect leve
IPC is the trade association for the printed wiring board and electronics assembly industries.
Training Provider / Events Organizer / Association / Non-Profit
3000 Lakeside Drive, 309 S
Bannockburn, IL USA
Phone: 847-615-7100
