Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 13 13:18:50 EDT 2004 | arcandspark
David F. thanks for information about the copper plating issues, I will check out the Indium site as you suggest. You are right about Thermount being Unreworkable, but T.I. makes us do it due to the cost of these RF proto types, $250 each bard board.
Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 28 15:10:50 EST 2006 | M. Sanders
Unfortunately, I don't have a copy of IPC-A-610 D on hand, however, I believe in IPC-610, this �floating height� between lead and pad has no maximum specification restriction. As long as there is no voiding, it is still acceptable for all 3 classes.
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 07 14:18:32 EST 2006 | James
Billy, I have to disagree with you. We inadvertently soldered a Pb BGA with SAC305 paste and then had it micro sectioned and spectrum analyzed. Imagine our surprise when we saw the spectrum analysis showed Pb. The micro sections showed none to ac
Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 17 13:10:34 EST 2006 | amol_kane
I have Immersion Ag and Immersion Sn LF boards that were waved using SAC305 alloy. I have a lot of tears/shrink voids in the waved connections. I am aware that SAC305 in wave has a propensity of shrink tears/voids due to the non eutectic property of
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 12 21:31:26 EST 2015 | warwolf
The closer your inspection the more defects you will find, the more rework you do the possible cost you will add and the potential increase of damage you could do to your products if rework is not up to a machine copyable standard. "Is there any in
1 |