Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 20 04:00:36 EST 2008 | caerleon
Our sub-contractors will be using SMD600. Thankyou all for your replies much appriciated.
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 19 06:02:22 EST 2008 | caerleon
Hi all, I have been in the game for near on 15 years and finally something has stumped me! As this site has always provided a wealth of knowledge and at times some amusement I have decided to post it here. Ok. My company uses a test method on an Om
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 19 20:07:05 EST 2008 | davef
First, it's GREAT to have a long-term lurker posting here on SMTnet. Maybe this will encourage other lurkers to join us. [We'll try to be on our best behavior.] Second, while Stephen Pence's explanation of 'equivalence factors' is accurate, your con
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 20 06:43:42 EST 2008 | sjpence
I'm not sure I completely agree with you regarding the smoke screen factor. I have found many times confusion around bulk ionic testing comes down to people not understanding your point about it not being a "standard or absolute value". Most people
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 20 19:47:04 EST 2008 | davef
Steve In response to your comments: SP: I'm not sure I completely agree with you regarding the smoke screen factor. I have found many times confusion around bulk ionic testing comes down to people not understanding your point about it not being a "
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 19 13:16:54 EST 2008 | sjpence
Simon, The equivalence factors were used to scale the values measured by ionic testing equipment to the values measured in the standard manual method. There is a good write-up by Bill Kenyon in this Technet Post describing the creating of the facto
| 1 |
.gif)
.gif)
.png)