Electronics Forum: ipc-tm-650 method 2.1.2 (Page 1 of 10)

Cross Section Equipment

Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 18 21:04:45 EDT 2004 | davef

Sectioning equipment suppliers: Leco, Struers, Buehler General automatic and manual sectioning methods: IPC-TM-650 2.1.1 and 2.1.1.2

Is there a cross section standard test method...

Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 24 10:38:33 EDT 2008 | davef

No standard, but common practice is: IPC-TM-650 Test Methods Manual * Method 2.1.1, Microsectioning, Manual Method * Method 2.1.1.2, Microsectioning, Semi or Automatic Technique

West coast testing labs?

Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 22 17:33:38 EST 2001 | davef

Steve, IPC TM-650 Test Methods Manual is a load. IPC TM-650 Test Methods Manual: Section 2.1 Visual Test Methods Section 2.2 Dimensional Test Methods Section 2.3 Chemical Test Methods Section 2.4 Mechanical Test Methods Section 2.5 Electrical Test M

PCB Warpage

Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 07 20:16:23 EDT 2005 | davef

Q1) Simple way to measure the PCB warpage A1) IPC-TM-650; Method 2.4.22 Bow & Twist Q2) What is the maximum warpage can the SMT machine allow the to accept and place the component without problem. A2) That depends. IPC-A-610 Acceptability of Elect

Re: PCB fab supplier supplier/evaluation

Electronics Forum | Sun Aug 08 11:15:32 EDT 1999 | Earl Moon

| | Mike, | | | | Got your message and those of others concerning PCB fab supplier evaluation and qualification check lists, etc. I have a severe problem here in WI as I can hardly access the internet, and when I do it is cut off abruptly for no goo

IPC-TM-650

Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 22 08:52:29 EDT 2009 | spitkis2

Can someone clarify whether IPC-TM-650 Test Method 2.6.27 (Thermal Stress, Convection Reflow Assembly Simultation) is required for all bare board fabricators? Or is this test method optional, depending on the type or class of boards being fabricated

Ionic Contamination Tests

Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 25 17:42:11 EDT 2007 | gsala

your comments will be appreciated, please; IC tests have been performed on two kind of Raw PCBs (HASL) samples by adopting three different methods : First Sample (supllier A) - Omegameter 600 SMT, solvent=40�C: extratcing time 10 min result = 0.2

force between the pad and laminate material

Electronics Forum | Wed Jun 12 08:13:29 EDT 2002 | davef

Don't sound proper. There is no specification. Pad peel strength test methods are: * IPC-TM-650, Method 2.4.21 for multiple solderings * IPC-TM-650, Method 2.4.8 for copper peel with a Instron machine. Typical requirement for Cu is: 6 lbf/in [1

Ionic Contamination Tests

Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 25 20:33:02 EDT 2007 | davef

We vote for: IPC-TM-650 2.3.25.1, solvent: 80�C, extract time: 60 minutes, hold time: 30 minutes or until room temperature. Listen, it really doesn't matter which method you decide to use. IPC-TM-650 2.3.25 is a process control method. It's more imp

warp and twist

Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 14 09:10:43 EST 2017 | davef

Assuming the traces run parallel and perpendicular to each other, I'd choose one direction the traces run as "x" and the other direction for "y." Then I'd pick a unique identifier on the board to insure proper orientation. Next, I'd measure warp and

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next

ipc-tm-650 method 2.1.2 searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information

convection smt reflow ovens

World's Best Reflow Oven Customizable for Unique Applications
Selective Soldering Nozzles

Nozzles, Feeders, Spare Parts - Siemens, Fuji, Juki, Yamaha, etc...
SMT Machines

High Throughput Reflow Oven
Assembly Automation Technology

Thermal Transfer Materials.