Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 06 11:11:04 EST 2015 | mascott123
I have asked that same question to a co-chair of the J-STD-001 committee who in turn checked with personnel at IPC. The answer I received is that yes you can apply the Class 3 assembly requirements using a class 2 PWB but the resultant assembly will
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 23 15:41:31 EDT 2002 | habs24
Does anyone have any information or experience soldering of class 3 products with WS fluxes. We are currently leaning toward Alpha WS609 flux, however the customer's interpretation of J-Std-001C feels that type 'H' fluxes (WS) are not allowed. Any
Electronics Forum | Tue May 27 17:09:46 EDT 2003 | davef
J-STD-001C, Table 11-1 is a good starting point.
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 24 22:45:54 EDT 2002 | davef
WS609 is a wonderful paste. J-STD-001, 4.2 states words to the effect that for Class 3 products Type H or M fluxes should only be used for tinning operatins. Most water soluable fluxes are either H or M. I believe that you can use Type H or M flux
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 13 12:39:56 EDT 2024 | griinder
Are we interpreting J-STD-001 section "3.3 Fluxes" correctly? Is this stating ORH0 solder paste can not be used on class 2 and 3 products?
Electronics Forum | Thu May 31 10:25:19 EDT 2012 | edmaya33
J-STD-001E, 8.3.6.2 states 1.56um/cm2 NaCl value.
Electronics Forum | Thu May 23 07:50:04 EDT 2013 | icin
The attached images appear to be a result of a touchup process. We believe that this is not a fracture, but more of a condition where the solder touchup process did not completely flow the solder. Is this acceptable per J-STD-001 and IPC-A-610 Class
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 05 18:16:37 EST 2009 | adamcrum
Can somebody help me to understand what standards are in place for deinozed water for cleaning circuit boards. I know they are supposed to be in acordance with J-STD-001D, but what does that entail? All I can find on the internet is that J-STD-001D a
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 07 22:51:05 EDT 2008 | davef
We expect aerospace to be IPC-A-610, Class 3 and J-STD-001, Class 3. The above quality statement stecifies: * "IPC 610, Class 2 acceptability." This is unclear. Should this be "IPC-A-610, Class 2 acceptability?" * No class for J-STD-001. Should we a
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 09 13:31:59 EST 2004 | blu_nozer
I suggest you look at the IPC/EIA J-STD-001C. It provides 3 different yardsticks depending on the end use of the equipment. Class 3 became the de facto military standard in Noth America since MIL-STD-2000A was withdrawn. Bob
