Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 15 10:44:53 EST 2011 | davef
Hi Joe This last sentence was not included in previous versions of J-STD-001. So, the first sentence required that all components, wires and boards had to be tested for solderability prior to use. We're talking 100% testing and inspection. That's bu
Electronics Forum | Fri Aug 30 22:51:14 EDT 2013 | cvogel
IPC-J-STD-001E in regards to Ionic Cleanliness standards states less than 1.56 µg/cm² of total NaCL. Assuming a typical electronic process which involves smt, wave, and post-hand soldering and uses NO-Clean flux throughout all process, is it typi
Electronics Forum | Thu May 31 10:25:19 EDT 2012 | edmaya33
J-STD-001E, 8.3.6.2 states 1.56um/cm2 NaCl value.
Electronics Forum | Thu May 31 21:43:44 EDT 2012 | davef
edmaya33, you're correct about what J-STD-001E says, but recognize that the measure that you refer us to in not IC [Ion Chromatography]. It is modified ROSE [Resistivity of Solvent Extract] ... or whatever they call modified ROSE now-a-days
Electronics Forum | Wed Dec 14 19:49:11 EST 2011 | joeherz
Been awhile.... We are in the process of determining where are gaps are for compliance to J-STD-001E and I have a question for those in the know. This section of the standard says the following: ----------- Electronic/mechanical components (includi
Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 05 22:36:38 EDT 2013 | davef
Yes, providing your: * Inbound material does not compromise your process. * Soldering processes apply the proper amount of flux and activate it properly * Material handling does not contaminate your boards Recognize that the IPC requirements of less
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 24 07:18:51 EDT 2017 | jamesbarnhart
IPC has updated assembly standards for IPC A-610 and IPC JSTD-001 making them easier to use and adding information in areas that have evolved. Both IPC J-STD-001E and IPC-A-610E have also been more closely linked to eliminating the differences that c
| 1 |
