Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 24 15:21:48 EST 2006 | billyd
Hi all. I'm about to invest in a BGA reballing kit, and was wondering if I could get some endorsments or at least some product reviews from any of you who may be now, or have in the past, used any of the kits out there. I'm looking to combine ease of
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 25 09:43:09 EST 2006 | billyd
Thanks Russ. I was pretty sure I'd be ending up going with that, since it seems to be a pretty popular kit, overall in the industry. Thanks again.
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 24 15:24:30 EST 2006 | russ
Have been quite happy overall with Winslows preforms.
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 25 13:38:58 EST 2006 | mrduckmann2000
I have used Winslow preforms several times.....sometimes with great results and others with not so good. It just depends on the BGA. I have a custom ASIC that will not re-ball, Winslow has even had trouble re-balling them. I would suggest using an
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 25 17:12:41 EST 2006 | adrian_nishimoto
Billy, I think the most versatile kit out there is the RB-2000 system from Mini Micro Stencil. We have not run into a part yet that we could not reball, even ones with a raised encapsulated center. They even make custom screens that match the compo
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 26 06:43:53 EST 2006 | billyd
Thanks guys. I laid out he $250 for the Winslow. We don't do a very large amount of it here at all, so with any luck this'll provide us with what we need. Going forward, should we need something more versatile, I'll probably purchase the Mini-micro
Electronics Forum | Tue May 06 09:44:23 EDT 2003 | gregp
A quick question(s) to anyone who operates SMT lines with only one multi purpose flex machine (P&P). What is an ample feeder count for this machine?...and secondly, do you have a standard kit of common parts that you would wish to reside permanantly
Electronics Forum | Fri May 09 09:29:25 EDT 2003 | gregp
Thanks for the response k_h, A few follow up questions... 1. 70-90 slots seems low for a one machine line. What is the maximum number of different parts on your worst case job? 2. Could the common parts be adressed by being assigned as "point of use
Electronics Forum | Fri May 09 10:44:41 EDT 2003 | gregp
"Point of use" could be your common high runner parts. They are sometimes kept next to the machines (at the point of use) and may be categorized seperately from the rest of the inventory. In your case all of your parts are inventoried next to the m
Electronics Forum | Fri May 09 11:09:47 EDT 2003 | k_h
Each machine has two feeder tables, one is fixed, the other interchangable. Parts on both sides of the machines does not create a kitting problem but can be inconvenient for feeder replenishment. I have found "U" shaped lines to be much more operator
