Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 04 22:14:17 EST 2015 | joej
Is anyone using this LED having issues?
Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 04 09:35:45 EST 2005 | glaucon
The base model UP3000 is really a general designation for the platform. The use of "UP3030" designated the configuration of the machine from the factory. The UP3030 (if memory serves me) came with 2D, a vacuum stencil wiper, and a paste dispenser. I
Electronics Forum | Sat Dec 06 23:54:49 EST 2003 | Dean
3000 base model 3010 adds feature 3020 adds features 3030 adds features 3040 adds features 3050...top of the line Sorry I don't have the feature list. It's things like Environmental control unit, under stencil wiper, stencil exchanger, 2d inspe
Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 05 21:14:08 EDT 2006 | chrisgriffin
I'm with Chunks on this. In my experience MPM's are very accurate and reliable. There are so many out there because people like them. You can make a program with 2D inspection in about 10 minutes. Things do sometimes break on the 3000's, but not
Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 09 14:30:44 EDT 2006 | Brian
I agree with Chunks. Programming was much simpler. The 2D inspection is much better on MPM. I didn't have to use offsets on the MPM or the DEK very often, but did more on teh DEK. I didn't like the front justified stencils on the DEK. I also did
Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 05 16:45:19 EDT 2006 | realchunks
Wow, I'd have to say the exact opposite. Compared to MPM the DEKs were WAY longer to program. But find out for yourself CN. Program each and get back to us. Don't forget to program in 2D as well. That will be the kicker! As for spending money,
| 1 |
