Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 09 15:24:09 EST 2009 | jeffreyj
I keep circling back to my initial choice, a Quad IVc (or IIc) because there are so damn many of them and despite their quirks/foibles/whatever, they are clearly capable of getting the job done. Specifically, I've got my eyes on a few refurbished mod
Electronics Forum | Sat Aug 03 03:26:26 EDT 2013 | sarason
I have had some experience with both Manncorp specifically the 7722 machine and the Essemtec 7100. Both machines are supported in my software PCBSynergy. http://members.iinet.net.au/~sarason/ The service from Manncorp for my friends machine after s
Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 06 08:50:07 EST 2009 | jeffreyj
adlsmt - I do apply paste (Kester EP256) by hand to the boards now with 5 mil thick stainless steel stencils. A few of the parts almost always need rework, though, either because I didn't place them accurately or there's too much paste, or it got sme
Electronics Forum | Wed Dec 05 18:20:14 EST 2012 | davef
Your SMT5000 can place 25 thou components. I'd guess the TQFN-EP is 16 thou pitch. You get the picture. Before considering the purchase a capable machine, I'd add copper to the board to give my operators a break when they tweek the position of these
Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 09 15:58:09 EST 2009 | cellis
The biggest thing you will not get is the vision system like this. The 7722 has flying vision for most components and an upward looking vision camera for large components and BGA's. The older Quads had the Quad Align system which is laser vision.
1 |