Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 09 03:05:44 EST 2007 | fordf1502004
one of our chip shooters is dropping a lot of parts, the problem i have is i can not tell which manufacture it is. Can anyone out there help me locate a list with electronic manufacture symbols on it?
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 09 10:24:48 EST 2007 | stepheniii
Or do you mean who manufactured the machine? If so it should have a serial tag, if not it's been butchered by a third party.
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 09 18:17:47 EST 2007 | fordf1502004
Sorry I should have made it more clear. My operators are not identifing the parts after a job is run, all they are doing is bringing me a bag of parts at the end of a shift. By knowing the manufacture, i can look it up in our oracle system to identif
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 09 10:10:26 EST 2007 | slthomas
Try this: http://www.tkb-4u.com/code/smdcode/indexsmdcode.php for starters. I'm curious and a little confused, though.....how is knowing who made the part going to reduce/eliminate dropped parts?
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 09 22:16:17 EST 2007 | guest
For chip components it is very hard to identify specially the capacitors. You could get sample of each chip manufacture and compare the color. This is very labor intensive task. I suggest to sort by value ( capacitance, resistance) than by manufac
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 10 10:16:11 EST 2007 | slthomas
Pretty labor intensive operation as has already been mentioned. Bang for your buck is about zilch unless you're dropping expensive stuff at alarming rates. If you're not doing it already I'd start logging missed picks/drops/rejections and figure out
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 11 08:20:55 EST 2007 | davef
Marking * SMD marking list on http://www.tkb-4u.com is more update than "The SMD Codebook" on http://www.marsport.demon.co.uk/smd/smdcode.htm * http://www.marsport.demon.co.uk/smd/mainframe.htm * http://www.chipdocs.com/pcat/015/1124.html * http:/
Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 08 21:24:52 EDT 2001 | davef
First, not that it�s bad, but SM-782, the land pattern standard is a pretty far distance from a DFM check list. Now, if you�d said D-275 er more properly 222X, ama be twitchin� less. Second, your process should include two distinct elements: 1 Data
Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 28 10:38:51 EST 2015 | emeto
Just download datasheet for the manufacturer part number(if you have it). If you don't, it will be hard - it might be 1,2,3, or 4 symbols from this label that matter. Marking might be RAF, might be FE as well.You can see all possibilities here.
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 03 11:20:15 EST 2000 | John O'Brien
This is getting to be a more common practice, especially with the application of a 2-D bar code directly to the board (via laser, ink jet,etc.) Some really major companies are jumping on the bandwagon because it also allows treating each board as a l
