Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 08 02:19:01 EDT 1999 | Brian
| Is anyone aware of a web page for military spec's? I am looking for Mil-P-28809. | | Thanks, | Mike Demos | MIL-P-28809 is definitely obsolete. Not only obsolete, it was possibly the most scientifically flawed standard ever to to be printed. I
Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 05 10:24:56 EDT 1998 | Earl Moon
| I have just been assigned to look into the ionic chromotograhy test on our PCBA but I have zero knowledge. Could anyone help to explain what is this test about? Is it | a) a destructive test? | b) What is the measurement unit of this test? | c) Wh
Electronics Forum | Fri May 15 18:09:00 EDT 1998 | Earl Moon
| | | We understand that testing for ionic contamination and surface insulation resistance measure different properties. We assemble printed circuit boards for other companies. We will not get combs on 90% of the boards that we assemble. | | | We h
Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 11 15:06:39 EDT 1999 | Dave F
| | Thank you all for your replies. I guess my age in this industry is showing. This military spec. does not appear to be in existance. So, let me make my request a little more to the point: | | | | Is anyone aware of a specification specifically
Electronics Forum | Wed May 27 08:46:25 EDT 1998 | Dave F
| | | | We understand that testing for ionic contamination and surface insulation resistance measure different properties. We assemble printed circuit boards for other companies. We will not get combs on 90% of the boards that we assemble. | | | |
Electronics Forum | Wed May 27 12:32:15 EDT 1998 | Earl Moon
| | | | | We understand that testing for ionic contamination and surface insulation resistance measure different properties. We assemble printed circuit boards for other companies. We will not get combs on 90% of the boards that we assemble. | | |
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 19 13:16:54 EST 2008 | sjpence
Simon, The equivalence factors were used to scale the values measured by ionic testing equipment to the values measured in the standard manual method. There is a good write-up by Bill Kenyon in this Technet Post describing the creating of the facto
Electronics Forum | Sat May 16 19:31:27 EDT 1998 | Graham Naisbitt
Gentlemen, Please consider that ionic testing is designed only for detecting ionic contaminants. Yes there are instances of non-ionic contaminants that cause premature circuit failure. However, more importantly the prevailing specs are less than adeq
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 20 06:43:42 EST 2008 | sjpence
I'm not sure I completely agree with you regarding the smoke screen factor. I have found many times confusion around bulk ionic testing comes down to people not understanding your point about it not being a "standard or absolute value". Most people
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 20 19:47:04 EST 2008 | davef
Steve In response to your comments: SP: I'm not sure I completely agree with you regarding the smoke screen factor. I have found many times confusion around bulk ionic testing comes down to people not understanding your point about it not being a "
