Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 19 20:01:30 EDT 2012 | eadthem
some things to consider, Is there flux on the board. are there finger prints on the tops of parts. Is the board warped at the V score from reflow Is the board shifting in the machine during inspection. These are the issues we have had with our mir
Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 07 17:05:41 EDT 2024 | pradeep14
We are a high mix low or middle volume production. We are using 3D AOI MIRTEC. How to reduce the false cals. Every batch we are adding more samples to the program but we can't able to reduce the false call ratings. Suggest how to control the FALSE ca
Electronics Forum | Sat Sep 14 16:46:03 EDT 2024 | pradeep14
Thanks for the update. We are using MIRTEC AOI. The machine will give false call PPM in both PPM and DPMO. Kindly suggest which one need to use
Electronics Forum | Thu May 26 18:55:15 EDT 2005 | bakersm
I have been comparing Mirtec to Yestech on a regular basis. As a AOI trainer and installer, I have seen significant difference between the machines. 1. In a side by side comparison just today, using the same board, I found the following: a. Insp
Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 09 16:38:20 EST 2005 | Csommers
I looked at Yestech and Mirtec. Evaluated both products and decided for Mirtec. After using the system for a couple of months I decided to send it back. There is a lot of problems with bugs in the software, falls calls are in the high numbers and the
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 01 17:25:13 EST 2007 | Ben T
My vote is for YesTech. Both the desktop and inline editions use the same software, though the desktop version is quite slow. Programming is pretty easy, and if you have the motivation to make the process smooth, the false call rate can be low. Of co
Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 17 17:11:59 EDT 2005 | stansmt
I have been working with the Yestech system in my facility after evaluating the Mirtec. The yestech system has far less false calls and better defect coverage based on the test vehicles I ran. The YTV-1000 out performed the Mirtec in defect detection
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 12 13:24:46 EDT 2021 | robl
I'd get Mirtec in first and see if you can bring over any elements of your current programs to their latest platfrom & if you could be doing anyhting better on what you have. Mirtec's are pretty tunable to reduce false calls, so it maybe that even i
Electronics Forum | Fri May 26 09:43:52 EDT 2006 | smteng0201
We looked at YESTech and found that they not only lowered their inspections scores to decrease their high false call rate, but more importantly they missed actual failures. In the big picture, I would rather have the chance to look at something and
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 30 12:23:31 EST 2006 | John S.
Lou, There's nothing like working with it yourself. We went through this exercise several months ago. We evaluated MIRTec, YESTech, and MVP. We were looking at benchtop units, so all 3 companies were willing to send in a "demo" unit for 3 weeks.
