Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 22 00:25:46 EST 2002 | Jones
There appears to be less of a blade sticking out of the holder than the MPM set up. Thats something we noticed recently. We have our mechanical attack angle set at 0 degrees right now, but we are in the process of changing this setting by 5 degrees t
Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 15 08:13:18 EST 2002 | Dave G
What Snap-Off are you running ? I've seen this happen when a large negative Snap-Off is used. If you "contact" print (I.E. Zero Snap-Off) this tends to minimize the stencil coining. We use a mix of MPM & Transition Automation blades. I have noticed
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 21 21:50:38 EST 2002 | dougk
Silly question, but, are TR blades 'exactly' the same size as MPM's and seat themselves in the holders just like MPM's? Also, different types of steel are harder (less flexable) than others. Are TR's the same? If harder (due to steel strength or coat
Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 15 00:39:09 EST 2002 | Jones
I've noticed that after we have switched to Transition Automation blades on our MPM screen printers that the stencils seem to be wearing out faster and I see a wavy rippling effect across the length of the stencil thats impacted by the squeege blade.
1 |