Electronics Forum | Wed Dec 06 15:59:04 EST 2006 | realchunks
Chris, you need to get out more. I haven't seen a DOS only MPM in many years. Most MPMs do have that new fangled Windows on em'. Shoot, even seen one of them fancy flat screens on one (in the rich parts of the neighborhood)! Seth, what type and y
Electronics Forum | Sun Feb 13 20:12:53 EST 2000 | K. S. PARK
Hello . i am reviewing the s/p dek (dek 265 infinite) ,mpm (up3000). all user say the machines are good. but to me rheopump versus proflow. which one is better. someone out there using these head advise me. bad or good thing whatever it is
Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 14 12:41:56 EST 2000 | Dave F
Dek has the more robust design for their paste dispensor.
Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 14 18:12:44 EST 2000 | Brian Book
I believe that the Rheopump is the better design. The proflow uses a square chamber that doesn't allow the paste to roll. The control is far better also, and the design allows the use of standard piles cartridges.
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 02 17:26:24 EST 2004 | pjc
I worked on MicroFlex. All axis move via electric motor drive. Carraige reapatability is +/- 0.0005" (12 micron). Cameras position more easily on linear bearings than the swivel type. The alignment accuracy and repeatability easily supports sub-20mil
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 26 11:42:19 EDT 2012 | comatose
I have an ap-25 and wish i had gotten the UP-2000 instead. How's that for an answer? The main difference is that the ap-25 uses linear motors and air bearings, whereas the up-2000 uses ball screws. The linear motors are faster, but the whole thing i
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 22 14:31:03 EDT 2004 | northern
I have used both the MPM and DEK. The MPM's look nicer and have a few fancy features but the DEK printed more consistent time and time again. I believe you spend a lot more money for MPM's when DEK will give you what you need.
Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 28 21:29:56 EDT 2004 | KEN
Great! I have heard good things about value machines. Have fun printing.
Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 28 15:34:14 EDT 2004 | Kuru
Hi Ken, With a lots of help from Harry at Value machine sales I have the print working since June. Thanks for checking
Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 29 08:54:46 EST 2003 | pjc
SPM is superior. SPM has larger print area, up to 20� x 19", vs. 17.7� x 15.7� for the UltraPrint 100. UP100 is microprocessor controlled while the SPM has a PC. The SPM cameras can be positioned more rapidly and with greater accuracy than UP100's.
