Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 26 11:02:41 EDT 2011 | dyoungquist
TP9 machines are good, but old machines. We ran a TP9 for many years. As the machine got older it required more and more maintenance and had more frequent small issues similar to what you are seeing. We only saw 1 of your 4 issues specifically whi
Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 28 07:30:26 EST 2007 | cyber_wolf
We recently scrapped our TP9-2U because of an issue similar to this. The X-axis would overshoot the pick and place positions. This particular machine(2U)only has 1 X motor. The UFP's and the MY machines have a small fine positioning motor that is on
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 08 15:59:25 EDT 2004 | kbayram
Hello, I'm looking for a lower end used machine that can place a 55x44mm sized bga component, placement speed is n't concern. At the moment I have only found the quad ivc to be capable although I'm worried about the placement accuracy and repeatabi
Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 09 16:55:17 EDT 2004 | Sue
Yes, a MYDATA TP9 UFP machine can place components up to 2.2" square without any modifications. Refurbished TP9 UFP machines sell for about $45K in the USA.
Electronics Forum | Sun Nov 01 09:39:06 EST 2009 | jeffreyj
Interesting suggestions so far - keep 'em coming as I do a search on every one of them. Speaking of, it seems that if the humongous size of the older MyData machines isn't an obstacle then they seem to be a good choice for us... (to recap: we need t
Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 23 14:26:25 EST 1998 | Greg Rust
Has anyone experianced Core Dump errors with their MYDATA TP9? My machine (2/96) has 26 million placements and my operators have recorded 253 core dumps in 1996, 238 in 1997, and 18 in January of 1998. We run one job on the machine, period. Our prev
Electronics Forum | Sat Jan 24 00:07:17 EST 1998 | Scott
| Has anyone experianced Core Dump errors with their MYDATA TP9? | My machine (2/96) has 26 million placements and my operators | have recorded 253 core dumps in 1996, 238 in 1997, and 18 in | January of 1998. We run one job on the machine, period.
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 18 06:47:38 EDT 2007 | cyber_wolf
I was asking if it was a TP9 2U...... If you have a UFP machine then you are in luck. It is most likely the small X-motor. You can test it in the service program. Does the X-axis bounce when you are trimming magazines and stepping through placement
Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 17 12:48:59 EDT 2014 | cyber_wolf
The only reason you would need to run this calibration is if the camera was replaced or the centering camera got whacked which is highly unlikely. If your placements are off, put an offset in the parameter file.
Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 18 04:06:26 EDT 2019 | artem
Thanks for the info. And what about accuracy of the placement. Are both machines able to handle the same parts or are there any differences like for small components or BGA?
