Electronics Forum: nasa soldering certification (Page 1 of 8)

No lead soldering certification

Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 10 20:48:23 EST 2005 | davef

Try here: * http://www.circuittechctr.com/training/0250033.shtml * http://www.solderingtech.com/training/

No lead soldering certification

Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 10 15:20:37 EST 2005 | Kathy

Hello All, Can someone direct me to businesses that will come to your place of work and certifify your operators in lead free soldering for Class 2 electronic circuit boards. Thanks in advance, Kathy

No lead soldering certification

Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 15 05:10:01 EST 2005 | bandjwet

Another source for hand-on training as well a sCD-based training for l-f processes is BEST at http://www.solder.net

International certification programme for lead-free product test

Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 03 09:36:05 EST 2004 | davef

Unfortunately, IPC-D-279, IPC-TM-650, IPC-TR-464, and MIL-STD-810 will not answer your questions, because they do NOT address LF-solders. Even the tests in IPC-9701 need to be modified for LF-solders, because: * LF-solder has different creep behavior

LED lifted soldering defect

Electronics Forum | Tue Dec 24 20:04:04 EST 2019 | kylehunter

Hmm OK. Even a NASA article describes that rosin is safe not being cleaned lol.

Through hole pins not soldering

Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 24 12:59:59 EDT 2020 | davef

If whatever is preventing the leads on your component from wetting is oxidation, cleaning the component will not help. Consider trying a more active flux prior to soldering. Understand from your supplier the potential complications that may affect

SN100C vs. SAC 305 wave soldering

Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 20 09:58:48 EST 2006 | adlsmt

We are using SAC for reflow because of the lower temp and better wetting and copper disolution is not so much an issue in reflow. There is not much difference in the alloys and they can be mixed with no problems. I assume any supplier of SN100C cou

SN100C vs. SAC 305 wave soldering

Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 31 12:27:27 EST 2006 | Marcus

We have used the SN100C for over a year now with fanastic results. We use the SAC305 for SMT and SN100C wire exclusively. There are no problem mixing the alloys. I am also on the commitee for the NASA testing. The SN100C did out perform SAC and SnPb

Beginners' steps to run wave soldering process

Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 16 14:06:51 EST 2006 | russ

You are pretty much on your own when selecting fluxes. search archives in forums and see what everyone else is using and doing. Whoever you purchased the wave from should be installing this machine, certifying it, and providing training for your

Solder joint cleanliness

Electronics Forum | Sat Feb 10 09:29:08 EST 2007 | davef

NASA requirements may be a good starting point http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/codeq/solder.htm

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next

nasa soldering certification searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information