Electronics Forum: noclean flux concentration (Page 4 of 83)

Wave flux and profiling

Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 18 14:36:09 EST 2006 | samir

Yikes!! In-line cleaning, to clean cosmetic and benign residues (from a NO-CLEAN) flux... You sure you can't switch fluxes? Another variable with residues is the solder mask. Depending on mask type (glossy, matte, semi-gloss, or semi-matte), will

no-clean flux removal

Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 21 13:57:52 EST 2005 | saragorcos

Hi esoderberg - I was wondering if you had tried altering your soldering profile to try and fully solublize the no clean flux residues and elimate your cleaning dilemma? You can check out my company's website if you want some free reference material

no-clean flux vs. impedance

Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 18 15:47:42 EST 2008 | ck_the_flip

In theory, no clean flux residues are electrically benign...period. Here's a good test. Subject the board to some moisture/humidity, and have your circuit designer ohm-out any areas that may be affected by conductive material. Option B: Have a la

no-clean flux removal

Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 21 08:00:09 EST 2005 | Lloyd

I recently saw a brief presentation on selective cleaning using Co2. In basic terms a fine jet of Co2 is blasted onto the desired area of the PCB removing the contamination and supposedly causing no damage to PCB or components. I think it's quite a n

flux residue problem

Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 03 11:20:41 EDT 2009 | thunderdog5000

I have a customer that is having a flux residue problem after wave soldering. Flux is roaring through the board to the top side and leaving a residue. This is only happening on the flat stamped leads. The round leads are fine. They are using Supe

no-clean flux removal

Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 20 09:49:08 EST 2005 | Mike Konrad

Regarding the reference (Patrick) to a previous thread promoting �no-residue� fluxes, I must say that there is absolutely no such thing as �No-Residue� flux. There are �Low-Residue� fluxes and even �Very-Low� residue fluxes but to suggest that there

Water soluble flux

Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 22 14:57:18 EDT 2002 | Jim M.

I use a water soluble flux to solder an LCD into gold plated through holes of a .031 circuit card. Problem is the current water soluble flux (850-33) is not made anymore (the drop in replacement has a different formuala and does not work). The main i

Amtech 4300 no-clean+washable flux

Electronics Forum | Sat Oct 29 20:29:30 EDT 2016 | adamjs

Posting here because all the threads asking for feedback on it are locked. We have been extremely happy with the 4300 tacky flux for BGA attachment. Not only is it both washable and no-clean (i.e. wash-optional), it was also the only tacky flux tha

Amtech 4300 no-clean+washable flux

Electronics Forum | Sun Dec 11 22:39:36 EST 2016 | ppcbs

We have been using the Amtech line for over 12 years now with all of our PCB and BGA Rework. The NWS-4400 is mildly active and will give better results with Lead Free Solder. Note that the LF-4300 is considered a No-Clean. However it will show lea

No clean flux residue

Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 01 16:22:35 EDT 2001 | davef

Your supplier�s approach to managing process change is TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE!!!! Now, let me get the froth back in my mouth. How in the world do we know if the residues on these "no-clean" boards are compatible with your product? J-STD-001C, para 4


noclean flux concentration searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information