Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 21 17:49:52 EDT 2004 | jsk
problem: Too many solvents and boards are not clean Flux remains on the board after vapor degreaser and "Powdery" white residue after vapor degreasing Flux type is kester 186 Process: hand solder High Temp alloy, spot clean after hand solder e
Electronics Forum | Wed May 19 11:01:17 EDT 1999 | Vince Whipple
Wes, I have been involved with many customers changing over from an alcohol based no-clean to a VOC-free process. The change-over can be made easier by such things as air movement, convection preheat, "drains" or reliefs in pallets (if used), contr
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 05 17:37:56 EDT 2001 | seand
Hello Jeff, If you have components on your board be careful of how low the frequency is that you will be applying to your board. Ultrasonics are great for cleaning stencils and bare boards at around 40kHz. These frequencies (and Lower)may however
Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 19 11:36:27 EDT 2019 | bulur
How does no-clean flux residues on a PCB assembly impact the ROSE testing? Does no-clean flux residues on the PCBA dissolve in solution of ROSE tester and increase ionic contaminants level in terms of NaCl per surface area? Is ROSE tester solution (a
Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 12 12:59:19 EST 2007 | ck_the_flip
Here are the scenarios: *No-Clean Flux & Foam Fluxer: alcohol is used as a thinner (for titration purposes) if your flux is alcohol-based *No-Clean Flux & Spray Fluxer: alchol is used only as a cleaning agent for your sprayhead.
Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 02 18:05:20 EST 2009 | stepheniii
What flux are you using? We use a low-solids No-Clean water-based flux. Maybe some of what you are seeing is not residue from the flux but is from reaction with the solder mask.
Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 05 09:48:51 EST 2007 | George
Good morning, What is considered "high frequency" ,.i.e. Mhz,GHz,etc., when we talk about possible issues with NO-clean flux residues and product's application? I appreciate your help on this... Have a good one! George
Electronics Forum | Sat Feb 05 09:11:05 EST 2000 | Dave F
Graham: Maybe a twist on your comments, I don't believe that people understand the true cost of using no-clean. Dave
Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 04 13:07:46 EST 2000 | Graham Naisbitt
Casimir This is not an easy subject. How did you process the test pieces? Was the flux used correctly at the required and recommended level? Did it see the wave properly? I am not an advocate of no-clean but we do have customers who coat over no-cl
Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 07 11:05:50 EST 2000 | Graham Naisbitt
Dave You are so right about that point. I still use some cost models we ran up some 5 years ago. I took one to a customer and showed them that they could make $400K more PROFIT PER YEAR running OA v No-Clean. Their response? Well, we don't believe
.png)
