Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 10 08:10:39 EDT 2005 | davef
Comments are: * Sounds like it's necessary to clean "heareous F381, F352 no clean solder paste" in your application. Consider a paste that may be better suited to your application. * If you're cleaning "low residue flux", consider using an organic ac
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 08 08:03:30 EDT 2002 | davef
http://www.goapex.org/html/S32-1_Csonka-Peeren.pdf
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 08 03:09:12 EDT 2002 | Benny
Hi all How can I find the technical paper or source of information about using No-clean flux with high frequency apllication. High frequency mean more than 2 GHz - 5 GHz. I heard from my colleague that No-clean flux residue on board effect to high
Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 22 15:41:39 EDT 2007 | davef
Bruno The real question about your troop using Kester 951 wave solder flux on boards is: how is the flux applied and controlled. See, when you apply this flux with your wave solder fluxer, it is ideally applied in a metered fashion with your fluxer
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 16 15:16:52 EST 2003 | Mike Konrad
You are comparing apples to oranges. No-clean fluxes, because they are designed not to be cleaned off after reflow, contain very low solids. Normally, no-cleans have a solids content of 2% - 5%. Your basic RMA has a solids content of 15% to 30% (s
Electronics Forum | Sat Mar 27 12:36:34 EST 1999 | Scott Cook
| Hi, | I have a customer who's electronic assemblies produce RF. He is insisting upon aqueuos cleaning. We switched to a no clean solder years ago and no longer have an aqueous system. | Is aqueous cleaning necessary to eliminate 'cross talk' of
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 29 19:31:29 EST 1999 | Scott McKee
| | | Hi, | | | I have a customer who's electronic assemblies produce RF. He is insisting upon aqueuos cleaning. We switched to a no clean solder years ago and no longer have an aqueous system. | | | Is aqueous cleaning necessary to eliminate 'cr
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 25 19:29:07 EST 1999 | Graham Naisbitt
| | Hi, | | I have a customer who's electronic assemblies produce RF. He is insisting upon aqueuos cleaning. We switched to a no clean solder years ago and no longer have an aqueous system. | | Is aqueous cleaning necessary to eliminate 'cross ta
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 23 20:28:17 EDT 2001 | davef
We run both NC and OA flux, although the majority of our product is run on OA. For application not requiring uBGA, we find the benefits of NC elusive, at best. What? .... Your customer recognizes that initially the NC res in non-ionic, but sticky.
Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 10 13:34:43 EDT 2008 | rwyman
We have a Vitronics mySelective machine (model 6749, or "the Fat Bastard" as we affectionately call it). It's configurable with various combinations of "select wave" and "multi wave" pots. Ours has one of each. The "select wave" is for the most pa
winsouce.jpg)
.gif)
