Electronics Forum: omega-meter 600 smd (Page 2 of 4)

Omegameter SMD 600

Electronics Forum | Wed May 18 23:03:55 EDT 2005 | davef

Better hurry http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=58293&item=7514736516&rd=1&ssPageName=WDVW

Omega SMD 600

Electronics Forum | Mon May 21 16:06:29 EDT 2012 | solrac

Question, I'm new to this equipment, and have been asked a Question that has me stumped. When calculating the square area for a CCA to determine the volume. What do you do if it does not cover the CCA? I have read the manual and it state that the vo

Omega SMD 600

Electronics Forum | Wed May 23 17:06:29 EDT 2012 | davef

If you don't submerge the board, how do measure the level of contaminants on that portion of the board that is not submerged? I suppose that you could only submerge a portion of the board and guess that portion represents the whole board. Of course

Ionic testing and No-Clean flux

Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 04 09:23:21 EST 2000 | Casimir Budzinski

If No-Clean flux does not need to be cleaned, then why do I get readings of up to 27(ug NaCl/sq in) on boards that are not washed, up to 23.4(ug NaCl/sq in) on boards washed with DI water only and from 1.2 to 10.1(ug NaCl/sq in) on boards washed with

Cleanliness Testing with ionograph

Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 31 08:30:23 EDT 2009 | jhowrylak

My OMEGA Meter 600 is no nlonger operational. The new unit that I was looking at is the Ionograph 500. Does anyone have input on the Ionograph, or has anyone ever worked with both the Ionograph and the OMEGA600.

Re: Mil-P-28809

Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 11 12:27:48 EDT 1999 | Mike Demos

Thank you all for your replies. I guess my age in this industry is showing. This military spec. does not appear to be in existance. So, let me make my request a little more to the point: Is anyone aware of a specification specifically referencing

Re: Mil-P-28809

Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 11 15:06:39 EDT 1999 | Dave F

| | Thank you all for your replies. I guess my age in this industry is showing. This military spec. does not appear to be in existance. So, let me make my request a little more to the point: | | | | Is anyone aware of a specification specifically

Re: Mil-P-28809

Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 11 13:22:04 EDT 1999 | Dave F

| Thank you all for your replies. I guess my age in this industry is showing. This military spec. does not appear to be in existance. So, let me make my request a little more to the point: | | Is anyone aware of a specification specifically refer

Re: Mil-P-28809

Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 12 05:46:12 EDT 1999 | Brian

| Thank you all for your replies. I guess my age in this industry is showing. This military spec. does not appear to be in existance. So, let me make my request a little more to the point: | | Is anyone aware of a specification specifically refer

Re: Water Batch Cleaners

Electronics Forum | Mon Jun 28 13:34:06 EDT 1999 | Scott Cook

| Hey Scott, | | Good posting. However, what test did you perform and what was the nature of your technology? Both ionics (SMD600) and SIR on RF product to the 3 Gig range. Power amps and Xceivers. Technology was mixed; double sided SMT. My bare b


omega-meter 600 smd searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information