Electronics Forum: osp thickness (Page 1 of 9)

Re: N-tech osp problems

Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 26 20:19:51 EDT 2000 | Dave F

Never heard of N-Tech. Whose material do they use? Two common materials are: Imidazole (Via Systems) and Entek (Enthone) OSP is a lacquer that fabs apply to boards by either spraying or dipping. What thickness control does your fab use? For inst

Re: Tin-Lead thickness on PWB's

Electronics Forum | Mon May 18 20:57:06 EDT 1998 | Earl Moon

.025" pitch so the only problem we run into is too much HASL on the adhesive side causing improper glue dispense. | As Earl keeps saying HASL thickness is hard to impossible to control. I think we need to look hard at OSP's again but then you get in

Re: Tin-Lead thickness on PWB's

Electronics Forum | Mon May 18 22:54:04 EDT 1998 | Dave F

.025" pitch so the only problem we run into is too much HASL on the adhesive side causing improper glue dispense. | | As Earl keeps saying HASL thickness is hard to impossible to control. I think we need to look hard at OSP's again but then you get

Re: Tin-Lead thickness on PWB's

Electronics Forum | Thu May 21 09:54:07 EDT 1998 | Justin Medernach

| I'm reviewing my board fab spec. It calls for a minimum SnPb thickness of 50 microinches on HASL PWB's. I've looked at other specs that call out anything from 30 to 80 microinches, and others that just say the copper pad must be covered and solde

Re: Tin-Lead thickness on PWB's

Electronics Forum | Mon May 18 16:31:59 EDT 1998 | Jerry

.025" pitch so the only problem we run into is too much HASL on the adhesive side causing improper glue dispense. As Earl keeps saying HASL thickness is hard to impossible to control. I think we need to look hard at OSP's again but then you get into

Re: Tin-Lead thickness on PWB's/Let's Hear More

Electronics Forum | Tue May 26 14:50:07 EDT 1998 | Dave F

| | I'm reviewing my board fab spec. It calls for a minimum SnPb thickness of 50 microinches on HASL PWB's. I've looked at other specs that call out anything from 30 to 80 microinches, and others that just say the copper pad must be covered and sol

Re: Tin-Lead thickness on PWB's/Let's Hear More

Electronics Forum | Tue May 26 20:18:09 EDT 1998 | Justin Medernach

| | | | I'm reviewing my board fab spec. It calls for a minimum SnPb thickness of 50 microinches on HASL PWB's. I've looked at other specs that call out anything from 30 to 80 microinches, and others that just say the copper pad must be covered and

Re: Tin-Lead thickness on PWB's/Let's Hear More

Electronics Forum | Tue May 26 15:27:36 EDT 1998 | Dave F

| | | I'm reviewing my board fab spec. It calls for a minimum SnPb thickness of 50 microinches on HASL PWB's. I've looked at other specs that call out anything from 30 to 80 microinches, and others that just say the copper pad must be covered and s

Re: Tin-Lead thickness on PWB's/Let's Hear More

Electronics Forum | Tue May 26 21:27:33 EDT 1998 | Earl Moon

| | | | | I'm reviewing my board fab spec. It calls for a minimum SnPb thickness of 50 microinches on HASL PWB's. I've looked at other specs that call out anything from 30 to 80 microinches, and others that just say the copper pad must be covered a

Re: Tin-Lead thickness on PWB's/Let's Hear More

Electronics Forum | Wed May 27 11:19:34 EDT 1998 | Earl Moon

| | | | | | I'm reviewing my board fab spec. It calls for a minimum SnPb thickness of 50 microinches on HASL PWB's. I've looked at other specs that call out anything from 30 to 80 microinches, and others that just say the copper pad must be covered

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next

osp thickness searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information