Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 14 13:39:37 EST 2000 | Mark S
Hi All -- I'm about to design a DPAK part (case 369A-13, Issue Z)onto a PCB . The part's maximum length as given in the datasheets (On-Semi MAC4DHM) is 0.030" longer than the recommended land pattern as given in that same datasheet. (1) Has anybod
Electronics Forum | Mon May 25 08:37:28 EDT 2009 | d0min0
Hello, recently we changed supplier of the LF BGA, we did corossection and now have doubts... previous BGA specs : pitch 1mm, ball diameter 0.6mm future BGA specs : pitch 1mm, ball diameter 0.4mm on the crossecrion we found that one of the ball seem
Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 09 11:22:43 EST 2001 | denis
We are a contract manufacturer and we do business with a big company. There is a mistake in the design of the PCBs they are supplying: the pads are too long (under the component) and sometimes we get short circuit we cannot see. Changing the design w
Electronics Forum | Wed Apr 14 19:47:13 EDT 2021 | solderingpro
Sounds like you may have already found the issue: inconsistency from your supplier. Seeing as Gold really doesnt oxidize and you're using an inert environment (N2 I suspect), I would turn my attention to the supplier. You said yourself, the "Shine
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 25 21:50:10 EST 2002 | davef
Some of this was copped from Fred. There are numerous package types that now fall under the rubric of land grid array [LGA]. Land grid devices [ie, Bumped Chip Carrier� [BCC], LGA, Quad Flat-pack No-lead [QFN], MicroLeadFrame�, etc] are essentially
Electronics Forum | Mon Sep 13 09:49:16 EDT 1999 | John Thorup
| | I noticed that some of our pcb's component legend/designation are unreadable as they are placed under smt pads. Is this correct and according to standard? Although we don't have any problems with them as of now, I would like to know the effects o
Electronics Forum | Mon Sep 13 04:37:22 EDT 1999 | Brian
| I noticed that some of our pcb's component legend/designation are unreadable as they are placed under smt pads. Is this correct and according to standard? Although we don't have any problems with them as of now, I would like to know the effects on
Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 30 08:48:01 EST 2001 | dougie
Hi, Our PCB designers are beginning to send up designs to manufacturing that have increasingly difficult footprints to work with. The footprints have been generated by the IPC-SM-782 calculator but just look wrong to me. The pitch of the devices in
Electronics Forum | Wed Jun 30 17:52:06 EDT 1999 | JohnW
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | snip | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | John and Dave, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Again, I don't work with larger chip devices with this issue. The company I now work with developed a strategy, based on cons
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 08 15:16:50 EDT 1999 | Jason Gregory
| | | Hello: | | | We are using a Heller 1500S reflow oven to solder surface mount parts. Just within the last two weeks, the larger I.C.'s are moving while going through the oven. The parts are checked for placement before putting into the ov
winsouce.jpg)
