Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 09 00:57:05 EDT 2009 | jjmag921612000
SteveO, I had personal experience with this using a Panasonic MPAV2B. It took a while, but I believe the end result was to have some additional "Z" travel to press the QFN into the paste. Also, the design of the paste on the ground was key to keep t
Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 13 10:44:37 EST 2007 | slthomas
Since no one has responded I'll give you what little I know. My last place of employment used MSH-IIs and an MPAV-2B. As far as I know there is no optimisation capability at the machine like there is with your Topaz. The programmer used Panasonic
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 08 11:14:15 EST 2007 | slthomas
Of that list, I've only worked with Panasonic. Complex, fast chipshooters but noisy, a little clunky on the operator interface but the MSH's were vintage 1997 or so. The MPAV2B wasn't as accurate as I think it should have been but it got the job done
Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 21 11:52:56 EDT 2007 | slthomas
Mark, the only Panasonics I've worked with were MSHIIs and an MPAV2B and at this point I'm foggy on both, but both tracked component inspection errors quite well. You should be able to tell how many parts are rejected for thickness inspection errors
| 1 |
.gif)
