Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 20 22:51:50 EST 2004 | mlogic
Craig, Thank you for the reply. I will call you tomorrow. I am probably less than 2 hours away. Kevin B
Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 20 21:16:30 EST 2004 | adlsmt
DeHart went out of business some time ago. I do not know if someone bought the rights to sell spares but I do have a DeHart printer in storage that perhaps can be canabalized for the parts you need. I got it at an auction but it has some type of sens
Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 20 10:08:52 EST 2004 | mlogic
Hello, I am trying to get hold of frame Hold Down bars for a Dehaart EL20c and all the listed numbers for Dehaart and Lake Madsen are disconnected..... any ideas? I have tied 887-469-3570, 781-270-3285, 781-270-5274, 781-270-3614, 781-272-0794.. Al
Electronics Forum | Thu May 25 13:30:24 EDT 2000 | Jason
I have thin rectangular shaped part. It has three pins two close on one side and one on the other. The numbers on the part are: tcxo413 tcc9951 Any help would be greatly appreciated
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 02 14:25:14 EDT 2003 | Earl Wildes
Greetings. Does anyone know of a good reference on the proper physical handling of surface mount devices? We have a number of very small builds, so our stockroom is very often issuing single piece quantities. The parts are protected from ESD, but
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 23 07:42:25 EST 2018 | robl
Hi James, Thank you for answering. We can simultaneously pick multiple different part numbers with no problem, but we cannot generate programs simultaneously picking the same part number from multiple feeders on our Juki's. We can on our Yamaha's.
Electronics Forum | Thu May 25 19:33:36 EDT 2000 | Mukesh Lad
I seems to be S0T-23 device, and the marking is most likley a lot number plus DC. With out the manufactures name it will be difficult find out what the part is.
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 17 22:30:01 EST 2011 | olddog
Hi again Bob, I'll go by your item numbers: 1. OK, I'll not worry about it. 2. Somehow, it seems to me that it must be doing something or in Run Step Placements there wouldn't be different behavior for Alignment type 0 vs. other settings. I know I'
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 10 11:55:18 EDT 2017 | emeto
I am going to implement a part number system in our production. Still debating what is the better approach. Does anyone use intelligent part number system(where numbers integrates part package, value, tolerance, carrier, voltage requirements....)? I
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 17 05:11:09 EST 2011 | bobpan
wow.....lets try some more things....... first....i think quad align error 0 has something to do with the theta number not being at 0,6000,12000,18000. I am not for sure about that but check it out by doing a function 3 on your pickups. second.....
