Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 17 05:11:09 EST 2011 | bobpan
wow.....lets try some more things....... first....i think quad align error 0 has something to do with the theta number not being at 0,6000,12000,18000. I am not for sure about that but check it out by doing a function 3 on your pickups. second.....
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 17 14:33:02 EST 2011 | olddog
Thanks again Bobpan for all of your help. I hope some of my questions are dumb ones. Regarding "first", the QA error 0, you were right. In checking the setup, for some reason theta was 65227 instead of the 0 that I thought I had set. Regarding "sec
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 17 15:57:41 EST 2011 | olddog
Hi Bobpan, Regarding "second", the results of the test are no difference - still rejects the part. I tried 2 mils, 3 mils, 5 mils, 7 & 9. I changed the tolerances fron about 15% to 20%+. By the way, I did put on the new nozzle and it is still the sa
Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 15 14:01:00 EST 2011 | olddog
Well, everything WAS going OK until I started setting up for a board job (40 boards with about 450 components each - many image repeats). We setup 37 feeders with their parts and started defining the pickups and placements. Part #1 is an SOD123 zener
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 10 11:55:18 EDT 2017 | emeto
I am going to implement a part number system in our production. Still debating what is the better approach. Does anyone use intelligent part number system(where numbers integrates part package, value, tolerance, carrier, voltage requirements....)? I
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 10 12:55:33 EDT 2017 | stephendo
I WAS a huge fan of fully coded part numbers. One customer had some part numbers that must have been over 30 characters(maybe some over 40) long and some about 6 or 7. PTH parts can be the worst because it seems like back in the day a 1N4001 was a 1
Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 14 00:47:17 EDT 2013 | mun4o
Thanks , Reese.Yes , I check the capacitors with C-meter.When measured with C-meter , all capacitors are OK - +/-10% of the value. I can not underst?nd "Note: This is not a summation). Y5V -- -20% of nominal value, -part tolerance, -machine toleranc
Electronics Forum | Thu Jun 28 11:01:47 EDT 2007 | mmjm_1099
Hello all, I have a question in regards to part tolerance on parts. I called Fuji (not doubting them at all here just looking for more insight here) and asked them what the usual % tolerance on parts is. They came back with 30% of a part and the tole
Electronics Forum | Thu Jun 13 08:32:24 EDT 2013 | rway
Have you verified the measurements on the bench with an LCR meter? Chances are you are experiencing aging with these ceramic caps. We have similar issues with X5R and X7R caps. You will see the effects of aging with returns from the field as well
Electronics Forum | Wed Apr 11 20:27:34 EDT 2018 | kellogs54
Hi All, Sorry if this seems a stupid question but we been having a huge amount or parts rejected on our placement machines. I started looking at the placement program and found the part tolerance date seems to tight. Before I go and open the tolera
winsouce.jpg)
