Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 21 13:00:04 EDT 2004 | Bob R.
We found a simple solution to this dilema. We told the QC department that we (manufacturing engineering) would be happy to give them control and that we would make no changes to an x-ray algorithm or pass/fail limits without them being on site and g
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 08 10:49:35 EST 2001 | Simon
We are using the omega meters to determine the solvent extract conductivity. The book is refering to standard MIL-P-28809 who specifies a 14 ug/sq. in. of Na/Cl limit. The past owner of our machine was setting the pass/fail limit at 3.6 ug / sq. in.
Electronics Forum | Sun Jul 29 21:33:30 EDT 2001 | CAL
Your Ionograph and Zero-ion Values are set by you. There is no raw pass of fail criteria only the limits you set up. Ionograph is great for bare board resistivity (salt) test just as a pass fail for incoming inspection but this is all per your facto
Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 21 20:15:49 EST 2022 | arminski
since IPC-J-STD-001 RevH obsoleted the 1.56ug/cm2 UCL of ionic contamination tester in testing using ROSE test, how do you define the acceptable limit per PCB assembly? thanks
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 12 20:19:46 EST 1999 | Dean
| AVX and a few other companies make these chip transient voltage suppressors (TVS) parts that are a real *PAIN* to use. According to AVX: | "Due to the semiconducting nature of the doped Zinc Oxide (ZnO) ceramic material, SMT TransGuards ar
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 16 05:11:47 EST 1999 | Charles Stringer
| | AVX and a few other companies make these chip transient voltage suppressors (TVS) parts that are a real *PAIN* to use. According to AVX: | | "Due to the semiconducting nature of the doped Zinc Oxide (ZnO) ceramic material, SMT TransGuard
1 |