Electronics Forum | Fri May 03 01:25:33 EDT 2002 | gerits
Dear Sir, I do not want to mix in this "subjective" discussion but as an employee of Assembl�on (buider of FCM II, FCM multiflex 50, 75, 100) I can provide you with MTTR, MTBF, placement data (0201), software, and other (also customer) data on our e
Electronics Forum | Fri May 03 13:31:28 EDT 2002 | fastek
I agree with Sai regarding re-sale. It's night and day with Fuji vs. Philips. You can't imagine how cheap FCM-2's are going for these days. I've got a 2000 model with 200 hours on it (basically a new machine) and over 100 feeders available for very l
Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 17 11:06:44 EST 2004 | Base
Sorry Rob, FCM-1: first machines around 1990 FCM-2: first machines around 1996 FCM Multiflex: I think it was 2001? AX: about 1.5 years now But indeed, let's finish it: the entire discussion drifted a bit away from the initial question. I just get a
Electronics Forum | Sat May 04 21:02:26 EDT 2002 | saiwong
I really don't think so. Most of the time copy is much better than the original. For the durabilities, Philips can't compare with the Fuji, Resale vaule, productivities. Fuji is the best. Philips has many original; CD, SACD, Plasma Display. But the J
Electronics Forum | Wed Dec 15 11:24:10 EST 2004 | fastek
You're correct Rob. If you go back any amount of time in this business like it sounds you have (and I know I have), it wasn't that long ago that companies like Philips and Seimens were way behind everyone else, (Fuji and Pana) when it came to buildin
Electronics Forum | Fri May 31 16:16:42 EDT 2002 | Ozzy
Does Fuji even make the QP-132 anymore? I have not seen it at Apex for the past 2-3 years. This "inflexible" dinosaur was a commercial disaster for Fuji. Philips/Assembleon has sold countless more FCM than Fuji QP-132. The problem with both machines
| 1 |
