Electronics Forum | Thu May 20 09:47:25 EDT 2010 | pforister
Is this a single head Quad IVc or a dual headed line? if it is a dual line you can swap the align cards in the front bay between the two heads and see if the symptom follows. The card on the far right is a transport card, shouldn't need to swap tha
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 28 10:26:55 EDT 2011 | miroyu
Hello everyone . I received lot of help from people of this forum for which I want to say "thank you" guys. I had problem whit initialization of my Quad 4C which just sits for 2 years after purchase. I manage to locate problem with laser diode on pla
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 27 18:10:41 EST 2002 | andrewbrook
Quad4C's have their moments. If the price is right and you are aware of the machines limitations then you will be satisfied. The placement rate is slow, 1.2 seconds/chip. Don't buy any Quad if it has the CyberOptics Laser unit, the Quadalign unit is
Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 27 12:38:49 EST 2002 | stmerkt
Tyco has recently completed development work on the ThinPRO feeder. This feeder provides exceptional performance for 0201 and 0402 applications. The feeder is compatable with the IV-C, QSV, QSX, QSP-2, and APS platforms.
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 13 12:33:35 EST 2001 | Simply Anonymous
Try calling Quad, I know that they were in development of a feeder designed specifically for 0402. The problem has always been the pick of such a small part, but the placement is very reliable. By way, have you heard that Quad is being purchased by
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 17 17:44:19 EST 2011 | bobpan
Tim, 1. You dont need the vacuum verify if the quadalign is working properly. If you have the part quad-aligned and dont have alignment type at 0 it will never 'not' place a part. More or less...the vac verify was needed for the chucking machine (3c)
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 13 12:15:14 EST 2001 | onset
We have a 4C and it places 0402 components without any problems. The tricky part is getting the machine to pick them up out of the feeder it takes patience but you will get it. jake p.s. you
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 17 22:30:01 EST 2011 | olddog
Hi again Bob, I'll go by your item numbers: 1. OK, I'll not worry about it. 2. Somehow, it seems to me that it must be doing something or in Run Step Placements there wouldn't be different behavior for Alignment type 0 vs. other settings. I know I'
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 17 15:57:41 EST 2011 | olddog
Hi Bobpan, Regarding "second", the results of the test are no difference - still rejects the part. I tried 2 mils, 3 mils, 5 mils, 7 & 9. I changed the tolerances fron about 15% to 20%+. By the way, I did put on the new nozzle and it is still the sa
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 16 14:44:31 EST 2011 | olddog
Bobpan, thank you for your speedy response. As to the items you noted: 1. I did a test of Funct 30 for the first 5 nozzles, 2 times each as follows: noz1 Ht=215 & 219, center=1005 (all nozzles all tests), run out 2.2 & 2.7. Noz2 Ht=228 &228, runout=
