Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 10 10:35:43 EDT 2007 | cyber_wolf
We are using the tapered nozzles.
Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 10 11:11:22 EDT 2007 | chrisgriffin
Make sure the lights are clean and bright. Are you running at 100% speed?
Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 11 06:36:57 EDT 2007 | cyber_wolf
Feeder is brand new. (Checked cal. even though it was new) Lighting is good. Machine is in perfect cal. Nozzles are brand spankin new from Fuji. I was able to lower the reject rate considerably by playing with the offset and gain. I am placing caps
Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 10 09:42:02 EDT 2007 | fredc
Hello Sr.Tech, There have been two types of nozzles made by Fuji for 0201's one was a 1mm tapered to .4mm and the other has a straight .4mm tube. Has one superceded the other and if you have used both types, did one work better than the other? Asking
Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 10 08:13:03 EDT 2007 | cyber_wolf
Hi, What is the expected reject rate for capacitors on a CP643 machine. I estimate that we are dumping around 1 in 20 on average. I have played around with lighting levels,vision types etc. Nozzles are in mint condition. Can anyone offer any advice
Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 10 11:20:31 EDT 2007 | jdengler
Do all 0201's reject at the same rate? If even 1 P/N has a lower reject rate this can point towards a feeder problem. I have had a similar problem on a CP-IV-2 with 0402's that was caused by feeders. If all reject at the same rate it can be the PD o
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 18 14:03:09 EST 2007 | pima
Hello everybody!! I would like to know what kind of tool do you use to analize pick-up error rate at CP and IP fuji machines? Is it special kind of software or you use some customized solutions? Im thinking about writing some kind of database based
Electronics Forum | Tue Dec 07 13:40:25 EST 1999 | Tim
The company I represent provides electronic manufacturing services. Some of my customers ask that we ship their boards "un-tested". By un-tested I mean we build them, visually inspect them and out they go. I find that on un-tested boards, it's not
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 04 12:22:07 EDT 2001 | davef
Several points: * Consider that your Cpk is probably different for both placing large and small components. * Probably your routine placement rate SB the speed you use to monitor the accuracy of your process. * Some people use a calibrated glass test
Electronics Forum | Wed Dec 08 18:12:57 EST 1999 | Dave F
Well said Sotty!!!
