Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 08 13:22:11 EST 1999 | Earl Moon
| This is a question for those of you who actually assemble components onto a board. | Any idea what the "industry standard" is for fall out on assembled PCB's? I realize that the controls put in place in your processes will effect your overall qua
Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 08 21:46:49 EST 1999 | Dean
| | This is a question for those of you who actually assemble components onto a board. | | Any idea what the "industry standard" is for fall out on assembled PCB's? I realize that the controls put in place in your processes will effect your overall
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 11 18:07:55 EST 1999 | Lech Bartnik
| | | This is a question for those of you who actually assemble components onto a board. | | | Any idea what the "industry standard" is for fall out on assembled PCB's? I realize that the controls put in place in your processes will effect your ove
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 28 11:37:30 EDT 2003 | terrapinstation
Chrissie, There is no "silly" question. It seems to me that, not with standing the issues highlighted in your posting, notably - risks, time, etc.. Your time would be much better spent determining the reason for the reject. If your placement equip
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 03 15:55:42 EST 2004 | davef
Dennis: The IPC-A-610 requirements are seperate. * You need to meet all acceptance requirements, in order to be in compliance. * If you reject a part for any reason, you are not in compliance.
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 01 16:33:57 EST 2007 | mika
The reject rate of yours could be a number of reasons. 1. Which component types are rejected? 2. From a particular nozzle? 3. If the rejected part will be dropped on the reject belt or reject bin; it suggests that there is a problem with the componen
Electronics Forum | Sat Nov 22 09:51:51 EST 2008 | realchunks
You need to take it a few steps farther. The main reason you would want to reject a certain % off print is because it made defects. So you need to see how far you can go without creating a defect and then establish that as your cut off and the need
Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 30 18:10:19 EDT 2014 | hegemon
Rather than asking why, maybe the better response is to reject the PWBs and have them re-fabricated correctly? Of course circular reasoning tells me that the reason for your issues is that you have 3x the amount of nickel beneath the gold. I wish I
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 03 09:50:45 EST 2005 | slthomas
"Besides I did say they would do a job." I know you did....note I was responding to a previous poster. ;) I mutter something under my breath about our Quads daily. They reject simple parts randomly for no apparent reason, refuse to align some no ma
Electronics Forum | Thu May 08 09:00:03 EDT 2003 | stefwitt
I like to find out more about your feeder manufacturer. Known problems: If the cover tape peel back is located in the pick up window, the tape may lift the component out of the pocket and when the component falls back it could be inverted. The co
