Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 18 19:29:06 EDT 2011 | warwolf
hey Jacki we are looking at going from SAC305 to SN100C, if your looking to save cost it's a cheaper option. have a look into it.
Electronics Forum | Fri May 19 13:40:36 EDT 2006 | grantp
Hi, Sorry to drag this thread up again, but we were recommended to change the wave to SAC305, but is everyone recommending SN100C? That seems to be the feeling on this thread. What flux is used? Regards, Grant
Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 09 16:31:02 EST 2007 | dmunson
We are using SAC305 for reflow and SN100C for our selective solder.
Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 30 16:50:48 EST 2005 | fctassembly
250 tons/month) and, as it has been stated here, many customers have switched from SAC305 to SN100C but we are not aware of any customer who has switched from SN100C to SAC305. As the inventor of SN100C states, �once a customer touches the SN100C, he
Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 10 22:15:53 EST 2008 | fctassembly
Bob The actual process for converting from SAC305 to SN100C is pretty painless. Basic steps: 1) make sure your solder pot is at temp 2) de-dross 3) pull pumps/flow duct(s) and clean 4) purge pot of SAC material 5) remove any remaining dross/alloy i
Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 24 13:49:11 EST 2006 | yiannis
Seeing the threads about lead free I realise that all write about SAC305 and SN100C. None about paste with Indium . Why ?
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 15 13:47:16 EST 2007 | russ
They are all compatible with each other. Data is at alpha metals website and FCT assembly Russ
Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 01 19:10:15 EDT 2008 | gregoryyork
Before you change what problems are you having
Electronics Forum | paligora |
Wed Oct 01 19:16:07 EDT 2008
Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 07 07:58:13 EDT 2008 | cokedigits
Larry thats not very politically correct is it?
