Electronics Forum: sac305 sn100c (Page 7 of 13)

Solder pot & wire tinning help

Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 02 11:15:23 EST 2020 | slthomas

You'll want to chop your solder into "bite sized" pieces for your pot, by the way. A bolt cutter or a band saw are a couple of ways to do it without ruining other precision tools. It's up to you for the alloy you use, but there are several (some

Lead free tin copper only

Electronics Forum | Sun Feb 05 09:29:12 EST 2006 | Cmiller

Look at: http://thor.inemi.org/webdownload/newsroom/Presentations/09.pdf Page 47 shows both alloys to be similar in reliability although its a little troublesome that the particular defects are not isolated as I feel there is a big difference betwee

Steps to Convert SAC305 Wave Solder Pot to SN100C

Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 30 14:01:04 EDT 2008 | wavemasterlarry

Some fella from Honda once used a potatoe to clean his pot. Siad it was a pretty good idea that he learned from the japs he works for. There was a thread here on The Forum once if you could look it up.

Steps to Convert SAC305 Wave Solder Pot to SN100C

Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 02 03:11:42 EDT 2008 | gsala

Ask FELDER (gmbh), they can replace the alloy (SN100 +Ge+Ni ...) or even with a special kit (FUJI Patent) or if preferred you can transform the solder in the pot w/out replace it in a reliable way. http://www.felder.de/en_produkte.phtml Regards...

Lead Free Solder Sn(99%)/Ag(0.3%)/Cu(0.7%)

Electronics Forum | Wed May 02 02:41:30 EDT 2007 | May

Of course it is needless to say the performance of SACX0307 is worse than SAC305, and also to some other lead free solders,eg SN100C & SCS7.

Lead-free solder alloy: SN100C from AIM solder

Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 11 19:32:27 EDT 2005 | fctassembly

Yes, there have been many issues with the fast dissolution of copper by the SAC305 alloy. In fact, there are companies who have disqualified it for repair operations due to loss/thinning of the pads. SN100C dissolves copper much slower than SAC305 an

Lead Free Alloy

Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 13 14:59:30 EST 2007 | oswaldorey

Thanks to all of you for the positve input, I understand that my best option, after reviewing opinions and certain studies, that SN100C is adequate for wave and SAC305 for SMT. Thanks again.

Mixing lead free chemistry

Electronics Forum | Sat May 28 06:43:03 EDT 2005 | steve

I have the ability to offer both SAC and SN100C lead free alloys to my customer base. What might occur if a customer is already using SAC305 in their wave and they want to save money and go to SN100C. They now are mixing, tin,silver,copper with tin,c

SN100C vs. SAC 305 wave soldering

Electronics Forum | Sun Jan 01 22:48:46 EST 2006 | Joseph

We are using selective soldering pallet, which the soldering flux is Interflux 2005M. We encountered the poor hole fill mainly at the heat sink components. Initially we tried to apply more heat but tend to overkill the flux activity. After some modif

SN100C vs. SAC 305 wave soldering

Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 12 12:27:44 EST 2006 | johnw

Hi Guys I think you should all be looking at the Nousstar lead free machine this machine has been approved with some of the larger oems and has a good base in Europe and the uk we have one and the design is excellent we are using Aim for class 3 prod


sac305 sn100c searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information