Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 22 03:02:02 EDT 2012 | kcngoi
We use succesfully SN100C on ERSA330 for about > 2-3years. > > Pros: > > - price, - less dross > comparing to SAC305, - some ppl say better > mechanical durability comparing to SAC305 > (depends who pay for "independent" > studies) > > Cons:
Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 27 09:43:42 EST 2012 | andrzej
We use succesfully SN100C on ERSA330 for about 2-3years. Pros: - price, - less dross comparing to SAC305, - some ppl say better mechanical durability comparing to SAC305 (depends who pay for "independent" studies) Cons: - higher melting temp so r
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 11 18:44:42 EST 2006 | fctassembly
Hello Greg, Glad to hear your success with the SACX0307 copy. By the way, does the P mean it contains phosphorus? Does yours also contain bismuth like the SACX0307 (according to their plumbing solder patent for X0307)? In response to your discussion
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 04 08:32:21 EST 2006 | GS
HI aj, I suppose you have visited the Alphametal situ where they have plenty of information about SACX http://www.alphametals.com/main.asp For sure every one talks well about own products. I think the best judgement can be done from those who h
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 12 04:14:17 EST 2006 | Rob
The most prevailent wave solder machine in small to medium UK companies is the Blundell CMS400 - every man and his dog has one. And the recommended lead free solder for these machines is..... Greg's 0.3% Silver. Quite a few of our customers use h
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 18 17:17:52 EST 2006 | gregoryyork
Hi Rob You do not receive any benefit from me (I dont get any from my employers either) but if I knew who you were I would buy you a warm Guiness next time I saw you, or if you preffered a warm Bud I'm not fussy. You see its not difficult for compe
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 01 09:21:36 EST 2005 | TomA
I looked breafly at this alloy. My concern was that I had already implemented a SAC 305 alloy at SMT. So any of my mixed technology projects would one alloy (SAC 305) on one side (topside) and a different alloy (SN100C) on the bottomside. Most articl
Electronics Forum | Sat Apr 21 14:50:17 EDT 2012 | edmentzer
We are using SN100C in both our wave and selective machines and have very good results. We also using it for ROHS hand soldering. It flows better than SAC305, the joints are shinny just like Sn63/37. We are looking into using SN100C as our paste b
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 19 16:38:39 EST 2012 | dyoungquist
We are not using SN100C in our reflow process but I know the type of flux made a big difference with our SAC305 solder. We started out using no-clean flux in our SAC305 paste and were having some issues. We then switched over to a water soluble flu
Electronics Forum | Fri May 04 08:37:45 EDT 2012 | waveroom
SN100C is being used by 95% of our customers over the SAC305. The main reasons are Cost big savings easily $10.00 lb, nice shiny solder joints good for quality inspection. Very few people are using SN100C in SMT Due to increased temperature requireme
