Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 17 09:07:14 EST 2013 | mun4o
hi, we use SACx0307 since 2006 year.now , I want change this alloy with SN100C?I now that we must remuve all solder in the pot and cleen it.But that is very difficult process.What you think, can I just add new SN100C in the solder wave?What is the ri
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 27 09:47:01 EDT 2005 | GCampbell
CEMCO Uk have done testing using SACX0307, SAC305 and Sn/Cu/Ni. The copper dissolution tests (report available) conducted at CEMCO showed that the lowest copper erosion rate was achieved by SACX0307. Regards Gerry
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 11 18:44:42 EST 2006 | fctassembly
Hello Greg, Glad to hear your success with the SACX0307 copy. By the way, does the P mean it contains phosphorus? Does yours also contain bismuth like the SACX0307 (according to their plumbing solder patent for X0307)? In response to your discussion
Electronics Forum | Wed May 02 02:41:30 EDT 2007 | May
Of course it is needless to say the performance of SACX0307 is worse than SAC305, and also to some other lead free solders,eg SN100C & SCS7.
Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 09 08:57:56 EST 2007 | bbarton
By and large, the industry has determined that SAC alloys are the "best fit" for replacement of SnPb in our industry. SAC305 seems to be the default alloy at this time. There are several other alloys out there, each with their own strengths and weakn
| 1 |
