Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 22 16:51:36 EDT 2008 | inge_fi
I had some trials with AOI machines, most I saw Yestech and Saki desktop machines. For the software interface I much prefer Yestech which is very easy to use. But honestly for faults foundings and flexibility Saki is much better, the only thing is th
Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 19 11:10:54 EST 2007 | Angel
Hi Jose Luis, Have you tried Yestech ? They have very good service reps in Spain and several machines installed in your Country. Programming is very easy and are very useful for low vol/high mix and also for TH inspection.
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 01 17:25:13 EST 2007 | Ben T
My vote is for YesTech. Both the desktop and inline editions use the same software, though the desktop version is quite slow. Programming is pretty easy, and if you have the motivation to make the process smooth, the false call rate can be low. Of co
Electronics Forum | Sun Oct 26 17:58:15 EDT 2008 | inge_fi
Hi Tony_D, thanks a lot for your answer! Yes I'd want to follow your advice, but Here in Italy I really don't find a Mirtec distributor yet. Also for me the defect coverage is a basic feature for the AOI and also in my company we have low volume high
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 29 16:04:29 EDT 2010 | hegemon
In my experience, the best way to do a lifted lead inspection on a QFP is by laser height measurement. It is very difficult to consistently catch a lifted lead with only a top down camera. As you say, too many false calls, and still some escapes.
Electronics Forum | Sun Oct 26 09:05:09 EDT 2008 | tony_d
Hello INGE FI, I know what you are going through. A few years back, I was faced with having to purchase AOI equipment for my business. My selection team and I looked at several different AOI manufacturers. We found that only two AOI vendors were sui
| 1 |
.jpg)