Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 10 21:25:49 EST 2011 | zaza
Hi Jacki, You should change to SN100C instead of SAC305. It give you excellent quality: 1. Can reduced solder short & icicles problem. 2. Very shinning solder joints. Rgds, Zaza
Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 18 19:29:06 EDT 2011 | warwolf
hey Jacki we are looking at going from SAC305 to SN100C, if your looking to save cost it's a cheaper option. have a look into it.
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 03 13:44:36 EST 2006 | Jon Provost
We switched to Sn100C on 2 waves and kept one with SAC305. The SAC305 will be converted to SN100C as soon as the Aim rep. delivers it next week.
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 06 17:42:59 EDT 2006 | GS
found this interesting comparison (SAC305 SN100C) http://www.nihonsuperior.co.jp/english/data/pdf/nse2_1.pdf Regards..........GS
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 02 08:54:58 EST 2006 | aj
has anyone used or trialed the SACX from Alpha, from reportes and studies carried out it seems that its a go between SAC305 and SN100.
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 03 14:43:04 EST 2006 | amol_kane
the latest circuits assembly mazagine features an article on this by Karl Seelig
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 06 18:22:53 EDT 2006 | russ
Anyone using the new SACX from Alpha?
Electronics Forum | Fri May 19 13:40:36 EDT 2006 | grantp
Hi, Sorry to drag this thread up again, but we were recommended to change the wave to SAC305, but is everyone recommending SN100C? That seems to be the feeling on this thread. What flux is used? Regards, Grant
Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 20 08:27:28 EST 2006 | Loco
Just wondering what the companies that are use SN100C are using for reflow (I guess SAC), and especially for handsoldering. Do SAC and SN100C mix? are there any studies proving this?
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 16 12:54:00 EST 2011 | Shean Dalton
Jacki, your original post was regards to wave solder bath. With solder bar, there is no flux and you do not need to look for WS Sn100C. Sn100C is only a metal alloy. Regards, Shean
