Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 04 03:30:56 EST 2009 | smartasp
Hi All We intend to switch fro SAC305 to SN100C, which has been giving us great test results. Unfortunately we have a technical guy at head quarter, which refuses to accept the SN100C as it has a 10 deg C higher melting point as SAC. I argue besides
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 19 16:38:39 EST 2012 | dyoungquist
We are not using SN100C in our reflow process but I know the type of flux made a big difference with our SAC305 solder. We started out using no-clean flux in our SAC305 paste and were having some issues. We then switched over to a water soluble flu
Electronics Forum | Fri May 05 09:00:46 EDT 2006 | russ
Studies showed that there are no issues mixing SN100C and SAC305, I believe that AIM has this info. Russ
Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 09 16:31:02 EST 2007 | dmunson
We are using SAC305 for reflow and SN100C for our selective solder.
Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 01 19:10:15 EDT 2008 | gregoryyork
Before you change what problems are you having
Electronics Forum | paligora |
Wed Oct 01 19:16:07 EDT 2008
Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 07 07:58:13 EDT 2008 | cokedigits
Larry thats not very politically correct is it?
Electronics Forum | Mon May 29 23:39:11 EDT 2006 | Faizal
Can anyone advice me on the effect of SN100C wave solder on SAC305 hasl board? I suppose the silver content on the hasl pcb would leech(contaminate) into solder pot.? Would it affect the surface bonding between copper pad and the solder.?
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 04 07:15:02 EDT 2013 | anilw2006
We have using SAC305 type solder paste for lead free process. One sample paste received of SN100C.After reflow SN100C type paste joint looks brighter and good compare to SAC305. Please help me which paste is good for smt process?
Electronics Forum | Fri Jul 08 09:14:49 EDT 2005 | Jason Fullerton
I've tested boards with SN100C HAL finish, and wetting to the PCB finish was poor at best, using a no clean SAC305 paste.
.gif)
.gif)
.png)
winsouce.jpg)