Electronics Forum | Sat May 28 06:43:03 EDT 2005 | steve
I have the ability to offer both SAC and SN100C lead free alloys to my customer base. What might occur if a customer is already using SAC305 in their wave and they want to save money and go to SN100C. They now are mixing, tin,silver,copper with tin,c
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 17 10:10:57 EDT 2006 | slthomas
Any comments as to how corrosive it is to a solder pot, relative to SN100C?
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 28 13:29:45 EST 2006 | solderiron
SN100C, not as aggressive towards other metals as are other High tin lead free alloys. Why? Sn63/pb37 The lead prevented the tin from being very aggressive. SAC305 no lead, silver instead. Silver doesnt block Tin from it's aggresiveness. SN100C no si
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 30 15:15:34 EST 2016 | warwolf
Any lead free will eat a leaded designed wave soldering machine. But SN100c will eat it the slowest, our soldering tips used to only last 3 months with SAC305 when we changed to SN100c solder wire we are having around 9 months tip life. Our wave sol
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 03 08:18:17 EST 2005 | fctassembly
Hello Arnold, Just to clarify the Sn100C discussion: Please note that SN100C is the Nihon Superior alloy composed of tin/.7copper/nickel. The key point in regard to SN100C is that Cu does not go directly into solution but first reacts to form an inte
Electronics Forum | Wed May 03 11:26:57 EDT 2006 | George
Sheldon, Try using SN100C wire solder. It seems to extend the life of the tips plus solder joints look much better. We use both, clean and No-clean. We had the same problem while using SAC305... Thanks, George
Electronics Forum | Sat Feb 18 15:40:45 EST 2006 | Cmiller
Switch to SN100C (no pun intended). I cant help with the SAC 305 issues but we should have a wave with SN100 running very soon. I will let you all know how that goes. Please report back on the x-sectioning and share the results. I have heard some v
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 27 09:47:01 EDT 2005 | GCampbell
CEMCO Uk have done testing using SACX0307, SAC305 and Sn/Cu/Ni. The copper dissolution tests (report available) conducted at CEMCO showed that the lowest copper erosion rate was achieved by SACX0307. Regards Gerry
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 06 11:14:40 EDT 2005 | Inds
thanks guys for the information.. i am trying out with SN100C and hoping that the Cu will dissolute lesser than SAC305. inds
Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 24 13:49:11 EST 2006 | yiannis
Seeing the threads about lead free I realise that all write about SAC305 and SN100C. None about paste with Indium . Why ?
