Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 14 23:49:00 EST 1999 | Wirat Sriamonkitkul
I saw the problem of void in solder bump or in lead less component or some BGA. But I didn't have standard specification of that void is accept or reject? Do any body have the better idea or suggestion of the criteria ? Thank you, Wirat S. / Jan 15
Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 15 08:11:34 EST 1999 | Jim Nunns
Our spec on voids is 30% ball diameter in the center. On the component to ball and pad to ball interface, we use 25%. To determine this spec, we asked around. I don't know of any studies that have been done to verify if this is OK Regards Jim |
Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 15 08:09:56 EST 1999 | Jason Hall
| I saw the problem of void in solder bump or in lead less component or some BGA. But I didn't have standard specification of that void is accept or reject? Do any body have the better idea or suggestion of the criteria ? | | Thank you, | Wirat
Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 15 15:29:03 EST 1999 | Jason Hall
| Our spec on voids is 30% ball diameter in the center. On the component to ball and pad to ball interface, we use 25%. To determine this spec, we asked around. I don't know of any studies that have been done to verify if this is OK | | Regards | Ji
Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 15 13:35:03 EST 1999 | Terry Burnette
| I saw the problem of void in solder bump or in lead less component or some BGA. But I didn't have standard specification of that void is accept or reject? Do any body have the better idea or suggestion of the criteria ? | | Thank you, | Wirat
Electronics Forum | Fri Aug 06 10:27:05 EDT 1999 | Kenneth Hedman
| | I saw the problem of void in solder bump or in lead less component or some BGA. But I didn't have standard specification of that void is accept or reject? Do any body have the better idea or suggestion of the criteria ? | | | | Thank you, |
Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 15 09:27:18 EST 1999 | Earl Moon
| I saw the problem of void in solder bump or in lead less component or some BGA. But I didn't have standard specification of that void is accept or reject? Do any body have the better idea or suggestion of the criteria ? | | Thank you, | Wirat
Electronics Forum | Sat Jan 16 03:06:36 EST 1999 | Wirat S.
| | Our spec on voids is 30% ball diameter in the center. On the component to ball and pad to ball interface, we use 25%. To determine this spec, we asked around. I don't know of any studies that have been done to verify if this is OK | | | | Regard
Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 29 13:51:46 EDT 2000 | C. Ortner
We work in a "low" volume high reliability house building mixed tech double sided multi layer CCA's for long lived space applications. Our present problem is inspection questioning every dimple/anomaly on every leadless part(we put passives only thr
.gif)
