Electronics Forum: solderability problem tin copper (Page 1 of 91)

Lead free tin copper only

Electronics Forum | Sun Feb 05 08:41:15 EST 2006 | Cmiller

Are you refering to reflow soldering or wave soldering? Brian, do you have any data to support that SAC305 is more reliable than Tin-Copper-Nickel? NEMI reccomended SAC type alloys for reflow and Tin-Copper for wave. See: http://circuitsassembly.

Lead free tin copper only

Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 07 13:39:42 EST 2006 | gregoryyork

You can use straight forward Tin/Copper but it flows very poorly so solderability is an issue. Dosing with Phos improves this but need to stay on top of it. We have supplied some 3.8%Ag alloys for flow they work well but you get a small 'chill point'

Lead free tin copper only

Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 06 13:00:51 EST 2006 | amol_kane

Hi all, I just wave soldered 40 boards (20 if Imm Sn and 20 of Imm Ag) using SAC 305 (in this case the wave machine manufacturer (electrovert) suggested the alloy too). plan to carry out x-sectioning to see the results. overall, just from the visual

solderability problem

Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 11 04:06:46 EST 2005 | arnold

we are manufacturer of molded type transformer. we have a trim and form process and its damage the pins of our units. the TIN insulation was being damage so we decide to immediately solder (wave soldering) the units to avoid oxidation. my question is

SN96 solderability on electrolytic tin

Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 24 19:17:29 EST 2009 | gregoryyork

It could be that the Sn96 has dissolved the Tin rapidly and gone for the Copper. What dwell times are they using with the irons? Probably better off using a Tin Copper alloy for reduced dissolution worth a try Cheers Greg

SN96 solderability on electrolytic tin

Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 19 13:49:00 EST 2009 | bricke

We have been manufacturing a part using bright electrolytic tin as the finish. Our customer has been hand soldering using 63/37. They have recently switched to SN96 and have been experiencing solderability issues. We have sent samples to an outside

problem in solderability

Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 27 15:05:16 EDT 2008 | omid_juve

nothing relates to ROHS components and tin lead process?

problem in solderability

Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 03 17:09:23 EDT 2008 | glennster

Omid, In some cases we have been able to restore acceptable solderability by dipping the leads (one side at a time) in an active flux and then re-tinning. Usually a good visual inspection after tinning would reveal whether this was going to work.

problem in solderability

Electronics Forum | Sun Sep 07 17:16:57 EDT 2008 | gregoryyork

OK Pizza it is then, here goes. Dewetting of Ni/Au pads, paste favouring the Tinned component lead hence excess paste wicking on top of the components. Reason is EITHER Nickel migration into the gold due to high levels of Ionics from poor rinse OR mo

problem in solderability

Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 10 14:14:03 EDT 2008 | gregoryyork

Yes why did the Electroless Nickel layer split this is the ROOT cause. My guess is still that the resist was slightly miss registered over the copper and therefore poor adhesion of the Nickel ensued OR like I said originally the resist had contaminat

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next

solderability problem tin copper searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information