Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 25 11:33:44 EDT 2006 | bill
I have inherited a SonoFlux 9500 spray fluxer. It appears to have never been used and was build in 1999. It is missing the nozzle and a couple of other parts. Would it be worth it to get this thing up and running to replace a foam fluxer? Does an
Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 25 17:08:25 EDT 2006 | TD
If you have a titanium version it will be fine. Get the serial nuber off of the unit and call Sonotek to find out if your OK. WS fluxes are more aggressive on the standard metal that they use..thus the titanium version.
Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 25 12:55:17 EDT 2006 | russ
Definitely better than foam!! I personally love the sonoteks. They do not really use a "nozzle" by the way. The flux is pooled on U.S. head and it atomizes it and then you have air spray to form proper spray pattern, If you are using Water soluble
Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 06 17:34:24 EST 2006 | Vincent Whipple
Hello Bill, I have been away from the office and just got back to see this posting. Sorry for the late reply. Give us a call at Sono-Tek and we would be happy to assist with your spray fluxer and your wave process. We support any machine with our nam
Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 26 11:11:48 EST 1998 | John Hardy
We have installed a Sonoflux atomized mist fluxing unit (Model 9500)on our Future 1 wave solder machine. We are concerned that the retrofitting of this unit may not have been appropriate for our equipment, as we are now experiencing many problems wi
Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 27 10:15:54 EST 1998 | Chrys
| We have installed a Sonoflux atomized mist fluxing unit (Model 9500)on our Future 1 wave solder machine. We are concerned that the retrofitting of this unit may not have been appropriate for our equipment, as we are now experiencing many problems
| 1 |
