Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 30 14:41:46 EDT 2009 | bandjwet
There was a paper recently presented by R Cirimele at the CALCE Reliability symposium in which extensive testing was done on a part (thermal stress, vibration, shock) after numerous reballing cycles. This show no failures on the reballed parts. In t
Electronics Forum | Fri Aug 24 10:20:59 EDT 2012 | rway
We use CCI as well, but you might check out Q1 Test Fixtures in Ontario, CA. Their fixtures are a bit cheaper than CCI and the quality is just as good. Contact Tim Richmond: 952-454-4474
Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 27 10:44:52 EDT 2012 | rway
Well, your on the right path. Refer to my earlier suggested make/model and well as the four contacts I provided. They can assist you with your testing needs.
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 16 12:44:28 EDT 2012 | cobham1
We are currently checking parts on our boards with a digital multimeter to make sure values are correct. This process takes a large amount of time and is very in accurate Can someone please recommend a low capital budget system that is good and repea
Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 20 15:26:25 EDT 2012 | davef
Are you better off with a ... * Low-end MDA ... OR * Low-end optical inspection machine ... Do you really need to check component values? ... OR Are you just checking component values to be sure that you're inspecting well?
Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 27 08:08:20 EDT 2012 | rgduval
An ICT solution seems to be overkill for what you've described. What kind of volumes are you hand building? How many components are not marked? What is your current yield with the process you are using? What is/was your yield prior to implementing m
Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 20 16:33:09 EDT 2012 | cobham1
We check the resistors to value check them. We are using resistors that are not marked in any way shape or form. We also hand build everything so it is very possible to have our operators place the wrong part in the wrong spot. From a time point of v
Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 20 22:02:23 EDT 2012 | davef
Try: * CheckSum LLC, 6120 195th St. NE, Arlington, WA 98223; 360 435 5510 877 CHECKSUM F360 435 5535 checksum.com * Testronics, 903 N. Bowser Road, Suite 300, Richardson, Texas 75081; 972-542-3111 testronics.com
Electronics Forum | Sat Aug 25 11:54:48 EDT 2012 | dan_ems
Hello, I already build such a system with hardware and software from National Instruments. I think is the best solution because you can buy for the start only a Multimeter (DMM), a multiplexer and a software. Is very easy to do the programming but
Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 27 08:16:23 EDT 2012 | rway
No, in his case an ICT in not out of the question. An ICT, especially with many passive components, can give you piece of mind that the assembly was built correctly. Even with the addition of an automated insertion machine, you still run the risk o
