Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 08 08:28:21 EDT 2004 | davef
While not a standard on the scale of A-610, consider: SMTA Testability Guidelines - TP-101C
Electronics Forum | Mon Jun 26 20:34:14 EDT 2000 | Dave F
Gary: Allow expand on this topic a bit. Back in the gray skied past when people wore calculators on their belts, rather than pagers n Palms, and didn�t drink California spill, they used HASS that you mentioned and HALT (Highly Accelerated Life Test
Electronics Forum | Fri Jul 10 09:56:11 EDT 1998 | Justin Medernach
| I am looking for some guidelines on evaluating solder paste. I am specifically interested in No-Clean Pastes, as they are a completely new ball game when it comes to slump, tack time, stencil life, tack time, etc. | Thanks for any and all help give
Electronics Forum | Wed Dec 06 21:28:12 EST 2006 | davef
It's worse than just using the test equipment manufacturer guidelines. Along with that, you have to deal with each of the test fixture fabricators' preferences as well. What this boils down to is a negotiation with the test engineering group as to w
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 25 21:59:44 EST 2000 | Dave F
Michael: On reliabiliity, consider that: � IPC-SM-782, "Surface Mount Design And Land Pattern Standard" and IPC-D-279, "Design Guidelines for Reliable Surface Mount Technology Printed Board Assemblies" specifically describe via in pads as "poor des
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 08 19:32:52 EDT 1999 | Tom Reilly
FYI, Yes, it is true SMT Plus [ http://www.smtplus.com/ ]does not meet IPC 782 standards but is that the goal here or to meet IPC-A-610 standards for manufacturing? I agree that patterns do cause some problems if created to maximum IPC standards but
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 11 09:47:01 EST 2000 | Dave F
Abbas: Sources of information on DFM/DFT are: � "SMTnet Express" articles on DFM by Earl Moon � IPC-D-279, 'Design Guidelines for Reliable Surface Mount Technology Printed Board Assemblies' � Books in SMTnet and SMTA book stores � Other examples ar
| 1 |
winsouce.jpg)