Electronics Forum: testing again (Page 1 of 41)

Traceability again

Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 30 17:45:56 EDT 2003 | davef

Q1: Do you use some sort of commercial software for traceability? Or do you have an huge database and some self programmed data-collection tools for each machine? A1: We use commercial database software. Q2: So just why do you have to trace? Just be

Traceability again

Electronics Forum | Mon Sep 29 05:48:57 EDT 2003 | mario1304

Hello everybody, I already posted in this forum some months ago and I got some useful advices and experiences from the members here, so I thought I�ll post again and see if there are any new points for me. I�m still writing my diploma about traceabi

Solder testing companies

Electronics Forum | Mon Jun 29 09:27:39 EDT 1998 | Ryan

Mornin' everybody! We are located in Lansing, Michigan and are looking for a company to test our wave machine solder content on a regular basis. Does anybody know of a local company that will do this? Can we do it ourselves cheaper? Thanks again.

Lead presence testing

Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 09 09:23:57 EDT 2005 | Rob

Cheers Dave, Our quality department is now reviewing them. In the meantime there's a company down the road that charges the equivilent of $20 per sample. Thanks again, Rob.

Re: Solder testing companies

Electronics Forum | Mon Jun 29 11:11:44 EDT 1998 | Ryan

| Mornin' everybody! | We are located in Lansing, Michigan and are looking for a company to test our wave machine solder content on a regular basis. Does anybody know of a local company that will do this? Can we do it ourselves cheaper? Thanks aga

ICT testing to improve yields

Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 27 10:23:41 EDT 2012 | cobham1

I need to clarify something for everyone. The end customer is the Military. Our customers are military suppliers who do in fact have quality systems in place. When we build the product we end up potting the unit so the customer never looks at the ele

ICT and specifying PCBA testing

Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 26 11:31:34 EDT 2010 | rway

I have been using ICT for a number of years. It is still a viable resource for catching defects in the production process. AOI doesn't catch everything, such as bridging on QFN or J-lead devices (this will depend on the type of AOI and camera syste

ICT testing to improve yields

Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 27 08:58:24 EDT 2012 | rway

Reese, > > We would agree about the value of an > ICT system, in a general manufacturing > environment. However, a couple of notes > apply: > > 1. ICT isn't a catch-all, either, and > should be used to verify the process, not > validate it.

ICT and specifying PCBA testing

Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 29 12:10:14 EDT 2010 | rway

Test Jet will work for catching lifted leads, certainly. X-ray is the only thing for testing for internal solder defects such as voids and cracks. I personally do not have any experience using X-ray, so I cannot advise on its reliability. Perhaps

ICT testing to improve yields

Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 27 08:57:39 EDT 2012 | cobham1

We are not a contract manufacturer we are in fact a OEM. our product is used for military systems. The reason no values are on the parts is because the orginal owner of the product did not want anyone to steal the values and make their own version of

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next

testing again searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information