Electronics Forum: tin mitigation (Page 1 of 2)

Tin Mitigation Processes

Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 30 17:43:53 EDT 2012 | scottv02

I have heard there is a process for mitigating the pure tin issues for 0402/0201 size parts by the use of SN63/PB37 solder print process. Is this true and does anyone have the data to back this up?

Tin Mitigation Processes

Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 30 18:34:35 EDT 2012 | hegemon

Pure Tin terminations can be mitigated for components with solder terminations less than .030" in height from the PCB, by using 6 mil stencil with Sn63/pb37 solder paste. That's the simple story for our customers that require it. Beyond that height w

Interesting Article on Reliable Soldering

Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 01 18:16:51 EDT 2016 | sarason

I found this rather interesting article on the science of Tin Whisker mitigation. http://iconnect007.uberflip.com/i/721932-smt-sept2016/36 sarason

RoHS Part Conversion

Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 09 11:01:35 EST 2011 | blnorman

This application is military, which requires a minimum of 3% Pb on the terminations, or mulitple mitigations for tin whisker prevention.

Extended CA RoHS Restrictions Terminated

Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 06 10:40:49 EST 2007 | patrickbruneel

Darby, To my knowledge no case of RoHS (lead) violation has ever gone to court in the EU. The only documented RoHS (lead) violation (again that I�m aware of) has been settled out of court in the UK. Check here: http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/s

Swatch Group Granted Lead Exemption?????

Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 23 16:28:36 EDT 2007 | patrickbruneel

Chris, WEEE is great but RoHS doesn�t make since, here�s a couple of threads covering similar issues. http://www.smtnet.com//forums/index.cfm?fuseaction=view_thread&CFApp=1&Thread_ID=10341&#Message41486 http://www.smtnet.com//forums/index.cfm?fuse

Propensity of Immersion Tin surface finish fo whiskers

Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 12 09:39:39 EST 2005 | Amol Kane

thank you devef....My point is this....If you solder all the areas that have Imm Sn on them, there wont be any whisker formation DUE TO THE IMM TIN COATING.....whiskers could still potentially form as a result of COMPONENT FINISHES and effective miti

Non RoHs Requirement

Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 07 16:19:34 EDT 2008 | mikesewell

If at all possible buy parts with 3% min. lead on the terminations. If this is not an option, "mitigate" whatever the finish is. Typically this means tinning with 63/37 all the exposed lead, not just the solder joint area. Several companies can d

Warning not for pro RoHS people

Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 26 14:06:33 EDT 2006 | patrickbruneel

Jun 26, 2006 (See Comments Below) Editorial Managing the Naughty Child Mike Martel, Editor, Circuitnet I've been listening to voices on both sides of the RoHS issue and the more I hear, the more foreboding the tone becomes. Despite what some wr

Using RoHS Components in a leaded paste world

Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 31 17:34:37 EDT 2013 | hegemon

Keep in mind that you may need to assure that there are no pure tin finishes remaining on your parts. A general idea is that parts with pure tin (RoHs) finish will need to be plated with tin-lead solder to avoid the possibility of tin whiskers formi

  1 2 Next

tin mitigation searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information